Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |      actual moment at which he was being led on to recognize this
 2      I,  2 |            but such syllogism, not being productive of scientific
 3      I,  2 |          this antecedent knowledge being not our mere understanding
 4      I,  2 |       better known in the order of being and what is prior and better
 5      I,  2 |          of the connexion which is being demonstrated: more than
 6      I,  4 |        point to line; for the very being or "substance" of triangle
 7      I,  4 |          and is white in virtue of being something else besides;
 8      I,  4 |            what it is in virtue of being something else besides.
 9      I,  4 |            dies when its throat is being cut, then its death is also
10      I,  5 |          the demonstration because being parallel is true of every
11      I,  5 |        depends not on these angles being equal to one another because
12      I,  5 |         angle, but simply on their being equal to one another. An
13      I,  6 |            the mediating link, not being necessary, may have perished
14      I,  10|            the sense of analogous, being of use only in so far as
15      I,  10|             postulate facts on the being of which depends the being
16      I,  10|         being of which depends the being of the fact inferred. Nor
17      I,  10|            any conclusion from the being of the particular line of
18      I,  11|          not necessarily imply the being of Forms nor a One beside
19      I,  11|           than the middle as well, being of wider application; so
20      I,  11|           sphere of this kind, not being confined to a single genus.
21      I,  12|          in one sense geometrical, being ungeometrical in a different
22      I,  12|      different fashion: the reason being that "ungeometrical", like "
23      I,  13|       strict cause, because if not being an animal causes the absence
24      I,  13|       absence of respiration, then being an animal should be the
25      I,  16|          to prevent both premisses being partially false; e.g. if
26      I,  19|          the white is man because "being white" coincides with "humanity"
27      I,  22|         owe its designation to its being something other than itself,
28      I,  23|          affirm and some will deny being.~When we are to prove a
29      I,  24|       universal has not a separate being over against groups of singulars.
30      I,  24|         the universal will possess being not less but more than some
31      I,  24|           in these examples it has being as a substance apart from
32      I,  24|           the end of the coming-or being or coming to be-and we regard
33      I,  24|   commensurate and universal form, being more truly demonstration,
34      I,  24|            middles were B and C, B being the higher term would render
35      I,  25|       premiss, the other premisses being affirmative. If, then, that
36      I,  25|         affirmative demonstration, being prior and better known and
37      I,  25|           prior to denial, just as being is prior to not-being).
38      I,  26|           of B is, in the order of being, prior to that denying A
39      I,  26|         affirmative demonstration, being superior to negative, will
40      I,  30|          premisses, the conclusion being necessary if the premisses
41      I,  32|            false, both A-B and B-C being false; nevertheless, if
42      I,  32|      conclusions. For the kinds of being are different, and some
43      I,  33|    otherwise would be incapable of being otherwise. Nor are they
44      I,  33|    unstable, and so is the kind of being we have described as its
45      I,  33|        thinks a truth incapable of being otherwise he always thinks
46      I,  33|            animal" as incapable of being otherwise, opinion the apprehension
47      I,  33|          of "animal" as capable of being otherwise-e.g. the apprehension
48      I,  33|           capable and incapable of being otherwise-an impossibility.
49     II,  1 |            we know that the sun is being eclipsed and that an earthquake
50     II,  2 |         partial or the unqualified being of the thing-and are proceeding
51     II,  2 |        partial and the unqualified being of the thing, I mean that
52     II,  2 |     concerns a part of the thing’s being; for what we are asking
53     II,  2 |           concerns the unqualified being of a thing.)~We conclude
54     II,  2 |         present fact of an eclipse being evident, perception would
55     II,  2 |  qualification to he as opposed to being possessed of some attribute,
56     II,  3 |            the essential nature or being of something, and all demonstrations
57     II,  3 |          figure of plane-plane not being figure nor figure plane.
58     II,  4 |        that is, A is predicated as being of the essence of B, but
59     II,  4 | self-moving number in the sense of being identical with it. For if
60     II,  4 |          still it will not follow: being an animal is predicated
61     II,  4 |            animal is predicated of being a man-since it is true that
62     II,  4 |   animal-but not as identical with being man.~We conclude, then,
63     II,  5 |     determinant of the substantial being?~The champion of division
64     II,  6 |        this synthesis consists the being of the thing-obtaining our
65     II,  7 |          by demonstration that the being of everything must be proved-unless
66     II,  7 |            its essence; and, since being is not a genus, it is not
67     II,  7 |     essence of anything. Hence the being of anything as fact is matter
68     II,  8 |         and, the conclusion proved being universal and affirmative,
69     II,  8 |           as our first instance of being aware of an element in the
70     II,  9 |         cause of their substantial being other than that being itself;
71     II,  9 |  substantial being other than that being itself; but we do not thereby
72     II,  10|           cause of this difficulty being, as we said before, that
73     II,  10|         will be "The noise of fire being quenched in the clouds".
74     II,  13|           a subject not a triad-as being inheres in triad but also
75     II,  13|          divisors, but also as not being a sum of numbers. This,
76     II,  13|          is not identical with the being of triad, it must be related
77     II,  13|         will be identical with the being of triad, because we make
78     II,  13|     likewise be identical with the being of the subject.~The author
79     II,  19|            which it does come into being have perception and can
80     II,  19|           science in the sphere of being.~We conclude that these