Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  12|       predicated of B, B of C, C of D, and so indefinitely. Or
 2      I,  12|          predicate A of C. Next let D represent determinate even
 3      I,  15|           it is B which has a genus D, we have~all B is D,~no
 4      I,  15|           genus D, we have~all B is D,~no D is A,~therefore no
 5      I,  15|              we have~all B is D,~no D is A,~therefore no B is
 6      I,  16|          both premisses are false.~(d) It is also possible when
 7      I,  17|           predication; e.g. suppose D to be not only contained
 8      I,  17|           suppose that actually all D is A but no B is D; then
 9      I,  17|     actually all D is A but no B is D; then if these premisses
10      I,  17|            however, (ii) the middle D is not subordinate to A,
11      I,  17|            A was not subordinate to D, D-B false because if it
12      I,  17|          inappropriate. Then (i) if D is subordinate to A, A-D
13      I,  17|          another. If, however, (ii) D is not subordinate to A,
14      I,  17|          well be an attribute of no D, whereas all B is D, e.g.
15      I,  17|           of no D, whereas all B is D, e.g. no science is animal,
16      I,  17|           may be an attribute of no D, and D of no B. It emerges,
17      I,  17|           an attribute of no D, and D of no B. It emerges, then,
18      I,  21|            term is denied of a term D prior to B, D will have
19      I,  21|             of a term D prior to B, D will have to be predicable
20      I,  21|           yet another term prior to D, this term must be predicable
21      I,  21|           must be predicable of all D. Consequently, since the
22      I,  21|             be as follows: all B is D, no C is D..., since it
23      I,  21|        follows: all B is D, no C is D..., since it is required
24      I,  21|            is affirmed. Next, since D is to be proved not to belong
25      I,  21|            not to belong to C, then D has a further predicate
26      I,  22|           there is a given subject (D) of which some attribute (
27      I,  23|          inheres in two terms C and D predicable either not at
28      I,  23|            which A inheres in C and D, clearly B would inhere
29      I,  23|             B would inhere in C and D through a second common
30      I,  23|          turn would inhere in C and D through a third, so that
31      I,  23|          have to show that E is not D by means of the premisses,
32      I,  23|         means of the premisses, all D is C; no E, or not all E,
33      I,  23|             is the subject of which D is to be denied in the conclusion.~(
34      I,  24|           to be proved to inhere in D, and the middles were B
35      I,  25|        through the middles B, C and D, the other through F and
36      I,  25|        interposed. Let us interpose D between A and B, and E between
37      I,  25|           related to B and C, while D is affirmatively related
38      I,  25|       negatively to A; for all B is D, but there must be no D
39      I,  25|             D, but there must be no D which is A. Thus there proves
40      I,  29|     cohering term e.g. by taking C, D, and F severally to prove
41      I,  29|       series. Thus let A be change, D alteration of a property,
42      I,  29|         without falsehood predicate D of B and A of D, for he
43      I,  29|           predicate D of B and A of D, for he who is pleased suffers
44     II,  11|          cause-is the middle term. (d) This is no less true where
45     II,  12|           We next argue that, since D has occurred, therefore
46     II,  12|             we conclude that, since D has occurred, therefore
47     II,  12|           the cause is C, for since D has occurred C must have
48     II,  12|           if it is true to say that D will exist, it must be a
49     II,  12|             conclusion is C; for if D will exist, C will exist
50     II,  12|        exist, C will exist prior to D, and if C will exist, A
51     II,  14|       properties of every animal, C D E various species of animal.
52     II,  16|             is deciduous. Thus, let D be broad-leaved, E deciduous,
53     II,  16|             vine is deciduous), and D in E (for every deciduous
54     II,  16|           primary subject of A, and D and E primary subjects of
55     II,  16| respectively. A will then inhere in D and E, and B will be the
56     II,  16|           cause of A’s inherence in D, C of A’s inherence in E.
57     II,  17|           and B of every species of D, but so that both A and
58     II,  17|        attribute of each species of D (since I call such an attribute
59     II,  17|         inherence in the species of D: consequently A must be
60     II,  17|           cause of A’s inherence in D any more than A the cause
61     II,  17|           cause of B’s inherence in D? Now if A is an attribute
62     II,  17|     inherence in all the species of D? Then are the species of
63     II,  18|           cause of B’s inherence in D; hence C is the cause of
64     II,  18|           cause of A’s inherence in D, B of A’s inherence in C,