Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |         knowledge to impart new, the syllogism assuming an audience that
 2      I,  1 |              or enthymeme, a form of syllogism.~The pre-existent knowledge
 3      I,  2 |            By demonstration I mean a syllogism productive of scientific
 4      I,  2 |              scientific knowledge, a syllogism, that is, the grasp of which
 5      I,  2 |      appropriate" to the conclusion. Syllogism there may indeed be without
 6      I,  2 |           these conditions, but such syllogism, not being productive of
 7      I,  2 |             immediate basic truth of syllogism a "thesis" when, though
 8      I,  2 |             the possession of such a syllogism as we call demonstration,
 9      I,  2 | demonstration, and the ground of the syllogism is the facts constituting
10      I,  3 |       fortiori for the demonstrative syllogism of science. If, then, A
11      I,  3 |          shown in my writings on the syllogism, to prove all the assumptions
12      I,  6 |       premisses of the demonstrative syllogism must be connexions essential
13      I,  6 |               If, then, we suppose a syllogism in which, though A necessarily
14      I,  8 |             premisses from which the syllogism proceeds are commensurately
15      I,  10|           must believe", because all syllogism, and therefore a fortiori
16      I,  11|              shown in my work on the syllogism.~
17      I,  12|           instance, which, since the syllogism proceeds from universals,
18      I,  12|             proportion". There is no syllogism so, but there is a syllogism
19      I,  12|         syllogism so, but there is a syllogism if the most rapidly increasing
20      I,  13|            when the premisses of the syllogism are not immediate (for then
21      I,  13|           the planets are near. This syllogism, then, proves not the reasoned
22      I,  13|             predicable of C, and the syllogism proves the reasoned fact,
23      I,  13|     spherical. Put in this form, the syllogism turns out to be proof of
24      I,  13|             every animal breathes. A syllogism with this kind of cause
25      I,  13|            vines.~Thus, then, do the syllogism of the fact and the syllogism
26      I,  13|        syllogism of the fact and the syllogism of the reasoned fact differ
27      I,  14|          investigate causes: for the syllogism of the reasoned fact is
28      I,  15|           genus of B-there will be a syllogism proving A’s disconnexion
29      I,  15|              therefore no B is A, by syllogism;~ ~and the proof will be
30      I,  15|             to have a genus, for the syllogism will be either in the first
31      I,  15|            or B indifferently, since syllogism is possible if either is
32      I,  16|            case of error produced by syllogism. Now, two cases are possible.
33      I,  16|            only-for we found that no syllogism of universal attribution
34      I,  19|                             19~Every syllogism is effected by means of
35      I,  19|             three terms. One kind of syllogism serves to prove that A inheres
36      I,  19|              so-called hypotheses of syllogism. Assume them as they have
37      I,  19|           and complete a dialectical syllogism. If, however, one is aiming
38      I,  21|             In the second figure the syllogism is, all A is B, no C is
39      I,  23|        quarter-tone, and so on—so in syllogism the unit is an immediate
40      I,  24|         hearer.~(4) Demonstration is syllogism that proves the cause, i.e.
41      I,  25|              terms of an affirmative syllogism the middle is always related
42      I,  25|              extremes; in a negative syllogism it must be negatively related
43      I,  25|         basic truth of demonstrative syllogism is the universal immediate
44      I,  26|             the major premiss of the syllogism is the more obvious, we
45      I,  26|        contrary: the constituents of syllogism are premisses related to
46     II,  4 |           the following grounds:-(a) syllogism proves an attribute of a
47     II,  6 |             must not fall within the syllogism but remain outside the premisses
48     II,  6 |      conforming to the definition of syllogism. It is only when some one
49     II,  6 |            express statement of what syllogism is or what definable form
50     II,  6 |            proof by division and the syllogism just described are open
51     II,  7 |          that neither definition and syllogism nor their objects are identical,
52     II,  8 |            nature, yet it is through syllogism, viz. demonstrative syllogism,
53     II,  8 |        syllogism, viz. demonstrative syllogism, that essential nature is
54     II,  10|           essential nature, or (b) a syllogism of essential nature differing
55     II,  19|                        19~As regards syllogism and demonstration, the definition