Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  3 |          impossible except in the case of attributes that imply
 2      I,  4 |          g. line or number as the case may be.~Extending this classification
 3      I,  5 |    subject primarily and as such. Case (3) may be thus exemplified.
 4      I,  6 |          We must either state the case thus, or else premise that
 5      I,  6 |          even believe it-in which case he will be equally ignorant,
 6      I,  7 |         more sciences: but in the case of two different genera
 7      I,  9 |            which, however, in the case of these sciences have the
 8      I,  10|           their existence, in the case of the remainder proof is
 9      I,  10| Nevertheless in the nature of the case the essential elements of
10      I,  11|  expressed in that form; in which case the proof lays down as its
11      I,  12|     equivocal, meaning in the one case not geometry at all, in
12      I,  12|          conclusion would in that case inevitably reciprocate.
13      I,  13|         non-inherence. But in the case given this consequence does
14      I,  13|      sciences. This occurs in the case of problems related to one
15      I,  15|  intermediate term; since in that case the connexion or disconnexion
16      I,  16|        that all B is A, will be a case of error produced by syllogism.
17      I,  16|          may be true. This is the case if, for example, A is related
18      I,  16|            of course, equally the case if A-C is not atomic.~Error
19      I,  16|          of the premisses in each case.~(c) It may occur when both
20      I,  16|           the major is false. The case is similar if the major
21      I,  16|         is thus clear that in the case of atomic propositions erroneous
22      I,  17|                         17~In the case of attributes not atomically
23      I,  17| appropriate" middle term. In this case both premisses cannot be
24      I,  17|           as was stated to be the case also with regard to negative
25      I,  17|      premisses they occur, in the case both of immediate and of
26      I,  19|         the same questions in the case of reciprocating terms,
27      I,  20|           succeeding terms in any case are infinite in number.~
28      I,  21|        will also terminate in the case of negation. For a negative
29      I,  21|     propositions—as is always the case with the minor premiss—since
30      I,  21|         middles terminates in the case of negative demonstration,
31      I,  21|         if it does so also in the case of affirmative demonstration.
32      I,  22|                         22~In the case of predicates constituting
33      I,  23|        But this is not always the case: for, were it so, if we
34      I,  23|    outside the major term. In the case of negative syllogisms on
35      I,  24|          to full knowledge in the case of final causes such as
36      I,  24|            it follows that in the case of the other causes also
37      I,  31|         the cause; so that in the case of facts like these which
38      I,  32|       principles we may argue the case as follows, confining-ourselves
39      I,  32|          naive, for it is not the case in the clearly evident mathematical
40      I,  32|           that this cannot be the case has been shown by our proof
41     II,  3 |  essential nature and is in every case universal and affirmative;
42     II,  3 |  constitute the whole. But in the case before us the fact and the
43     II,  4 |          its essence. But in that case (1) the subject, its definition,
44     II,  4 |          man. It is, however, the case in which there are only
45     II,  7 |         nature? Triangle? In that case a man will know by definition
46     II,  11|        here too the cause-in this case the efficient cause-is the
47     II,  11|         end in view is in the one case health, in the other preservation.
48     II,  12|           are, always and in ever case); others again are not always
49     II,  12|          the general rule. In the case of such connexions the middle
50     II,  13|        which, we said, is not the case.~To resume our account of
51     II,  16|         let us say, in the latter case, in the former the earth’
52     II,  17|     meaning perhaps in the latter case equality of the ratios of
53     II,  17|    equality of the angles, in the case of colours identity of the
54     II,  19|         as we used to find in the case of demonstration. So it