Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |     evenness. For within a single identical genus the contrary of a
 2      I,  4 |          its subject as such, are identical. E.g. point and straight
 3      I,  5 |         durations, and solids are identical, and because they differed
 4      I,  5 |         knowledge? If triangle be identical in essence with equilateral,
 5      I,  7 |           of demonstration may be identical in two or more sciences:
 6      I,  11|       that there must be a single identical term unequivocally predicable
 7      I,  17|         Such error is practically identical with that which is inferred
 8      I,  22|       signify that the subject is identical with the predicate or with
 9      I,  22|       predicated of a subject not identical with themselves or with
10      I,  22|            seeing that man is not identical with white or a species
11      I,  22|         with animal, since man is identical with a species of animal.
12      I,  23|         in question, and they are identical in number with the middle
13      I,  23|         element is simple but not identical in all-in a system of weight
14      I,  24|      wider term, and there is one identical definition of triangle-i.
15      I,  24|           2) If there is a single identical definition i.e. if the commensurate
16      I,  32|         all derived from a single identical set of principles: there
17      I,  32|        the basic truths cannot be identical or limited in number. If,
18      I,  32|        basic truths? To call them identical because they are self-identical
19      I,  33|        and knowledge is not quite identical; it is only in a sense identical,
20      I,  33|  identical; it is only in a sense identical, just as the object of true
21      I,  33|       false opinion is in a sense identical. The sense in which some
22      I,  33|        are really many senses of "identical", and in one sense the object
23     II,  2 |        the reason of the fact are identical: the question "What is eclipse?"
24     II,  2 |   interposition of the earth" are identical with the question "What
25     II,  3 |  knowledge of the demonstrable is identical with possessing a demonstration
26     II,  3 |       conclusion that there is no identical object of which it is possible
27     II,  3 |         demonstration are neither identical nor contained either within
28     II,  3 |        would be related either as identical or as whole and part.~
29     II,  4 |      number in the sense of being identical with it. For if A is predicable
30     II,  4 |         of all B inasmuch as B is identical with a species of A, still
31     II,  4 |           is an animal-but not as identical with being man.~We conclude,
32     II,  6 |           major itself nor a term identical in definition, or convertible,
33     II,  7 |   syllogism nor their objects are identical, and further that definition
34     II,  8 |    Moreover, this cause is either identical with the essential nature
35     II,  11|       right angle. Moreover, B is identical with (b) the defining form
36     II,  12|         which the middle would be identical with the cause on the supposition
37     II,  13|  following argument. If it is not identical with the being of triad,
38     II,  13|     individual triads, it will be identical with the being of triad,
39     II,  13|        exhibited will likewise be identical with the being of the subject.~
40     II,  13| differentiae, since everything is identical with that from which it
41     II,  13|     inhere in things specifically identical, though not in the substance
42     II,  13|  generically but not specifically identical with the former set. When
43     II,  14|           we cannot find a single identical name to give to a squid’
44     II,  15| connexions that require proof are identical in that they possess an
45     II,  15|           in that they possess an identical "middle" e.g. a whole group
46     II,  15|        and of these one class are identical in genus, namely all those
47     II,  15|        these questions embody are identical generically, because all
48     II,  17|            17~Can the cause of an identical effect be not identical
49     II,  17|           identical effect be not identical in every instance of the
50     II,  17|    numbers, is both different and identical; different in so far as
51     II,  17|        are lines and not numbers, identical as involving a given determinate
52     II,  17|         requiring proof which are identical by analogy middles also
53     II,  17|          in subjects specifically identical. For instance, the cause