Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
speaking 1
speaks 1
special 5
species 48
species-i 1
species-number 1
specific 1
Frequency    [«  »]
49 predicated
48 even
48 let
48 species
48 triangle
48 without
47 figure
Aristotle
Posterior Analytics

IntraText - Concordances

species

   Book, Paragraph
1 I, 1 | upon a survey of all the species of such instruction. The 2 I, 5 | subjects belong to different species and there is a higher universal, 3 I, 5 | even if there is no other species of triangle but these. For 4 I, 22| was not qua white or qua a species of white that the white ( 5 I, 22| did so qua wood or qua a species of wood and qua nothing 6 I, 22| the predicate or with a species of the predicate. Predicates 7 I, 22| with themselves or with a species of themselves are accidental 8 I, 22| identical with white or a species of white, but rather with 9 I, 22| man is identical with a species of animal. These predicates 10 I, 22| genus with one of its own species. Nor (the other alternative) 11 II, 4 | as B is identical with a species of A, still it will not 12 II, 8 | light, or of man as some species of animal, or of the soul 13 II, 13| properties "peculiar" to the species, working through the proximate 14 II, 13| compounded of the infimae species will be clearly given by 15 II, 13| by the definitions of the species; since the basic element 16 II, 13| i.e. the simple infirma species, and the attributes inhere 17 II, 13| essentially in the simple infimae species, in the genera only in virtue 18 II, 13| admits of no division into species. For it is clear that there 19 II, 13| would admit of division into species, which, we said, is not 20 II, 13| individuals which belong to one species and are generically but 21 II, 13| all members of this second species, and likewise in members 22 II, 13| likewise in members of further species, we should again consider 23 II, 13| eyes or for a determinate species of eye. It is also easier 24 II, 13| method to define the single species than the universal, and 25 II, 13| should be from the several species to the universal genera-this 26 II, 13| in genera than in infimae species. Indeed, perspicuity is 27 II, 13| separately the definition of each species through the group of singulars 28 II, 14| every animal, C D E various species of animal. Then it is clear 29 II, 14| then consider with what species it is connected and what. 30 II, 14| next question is, to what species does the possession of horns 31 II, 16| and, if this whole has species, universally and commensurately 32 II, 16| species-i.e. either to all species of plant or to a single 33 II, 16| of plant or to a single species. So in these universal and 34 II, 17| the following way. If the species are taken severally, the 35 II, 17| is coextensive with the species taken collectively (in this 36 II, 17| with the totality of the species. Then if you take the middle 37 II, 17| of all B, and B of every species of D, but so that both A 38 II, 17| universal attribute of each species of D (since I call such 39 II, 17| commensurate, not with each species severally but with their 40 II, 17| of A’s inherence in the species of D: consequently A must 41 II, 17| an attribute of all the species of E, all the species of 42 II, 17| the species of E, all the species of E will be united by possessing 43 II, 17| A’s inherence in all the species of D? Then are the species 44 II, 17| species of D? Then are the species of E, too, united by possessing 45 II, 18| inherence in the several species the middle which is proximate 46 II, 18| which is proximate to the species? Clearly the cause is that 47 II, 18| is that nearest to each species severally in which it is 48 II, 19| established: e.g. such and such a species of animal is a step towards


IntraText® (V89) Copyright 1996-2007 EuloTech SRL