Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |    enunciation, i.e. it predicates a single attribute of a single subject.
 2      I,  2 |              a single attribute of a single subject. If a proposition
 3      I,  4 |            or evenness. For within a single identical genus the contrary
 4      I,  5 |              proved of them all by a single demonstration. Because there
 5      I,  5 |  demonstration. Because there was no single name to denote that in which
 6      I,  11|           then, that there must be a single identical term unequivocally
 7      I,  11|              not being confined to a single genus. Otherwise its method
 8      I,  22|        follows from this that when a single attribute is predicated
 9      I,  22|         attribute is predicated of a single subject, the predicate must
10      I,  22|           that predication implies a single subject and a single attribute,
11      I,  22|       implies a single subject and a single attribute, and secondly
12      I,  22|            of predication in which a single attribute is predicated
13      I,  22|         attribute is predicated of a single subject is infinite. For
14      I,  22|        definition cannot inhere in a single thing, the ascending series
15      I,  23|            common middle term that a single attribute inheres in several
16      I,  23|         immediate premiss alone is a single premiss in the unqualified
17      I,  23|            the unqualified sense of "single". And as in other spheres
18      I,  24|     demonstration.~(2) If there is a single identical definition i.e.
19      I,  24|          Because the universal has a single meaning, we are not therefore
20      I,  25|            Thus there proves to be a single negative premiss, A-D. In
21      I,  25|          this negation comes to be a single negative premiss, the other
22      I,  28|                                 28~A single science is one whose domain
23      I,  28|             is one whose domain is a single genus, viz. all the subjects
24      I,  32|           are not all derived from a single identical set of principles:
25     II,  3 |          which covers this too. Of a single thing qua single there is
26     II,  3 |           too. Of a single thing qua single there is a single scientific
27     II,  3 |          thing qua single there is a single scientific knowledge. Hence,
28     II,  6 |           and not merely belong to a single subject as do musical and
29     II,  7 |              definition exhibits one single thing and demonstration
30     II,  7 |            and demonstration another single thing, and what human nature
31     II,  8 |           two definable natures of a single thing this method will prove
32     II,  10|             or because it exhibits a single predicate as inhering not
33     II,  10|       inhering not accidentally in a single subject.~That then is one
34     II,  11|           condition that they have a single common middle term. So it
35     II,  11|          from the assumption of this single middle term that the conclusion
36     II,  13| distinguishing each thing from every single other thing without knowing
37     II,  13|          thing without knowing every single other thing; and one cannot,
38     II,  13|           persevere until we reach a single formula, since this will
39     II,  13|      prescribe what is healthy for a single eye, but for all eyes or
40     II,  13|            this method to define the single species than the universal,
41     II,  14|        analogy: for we cannot find a single identical name to give to
42     II,  14|        properties as if there were a single osseous nature.~
43     II,  16|             On the other hand, can a single effect have more than one
44     II,  16|             species of plant or to a single species. So in these universal
45     II,  19|             of memories constitute a single experience. From experience
46     II,  19|           beside the many which is a single identity within them all-originate