Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |      existence of the thing. The reason is that these several objects
 2      I,  6 |    premisses. For though you may reason from true premisses without
 3      I,  6 |        as essential nor know its reason); but to have reasoned knowledge
 4      I,  11|          and not not-animal. The reason is that the major term is
 5      I,  12|         a different fashion: the reason being that "ungeometrical",
 6      I,  12|       doubt, it is impossible to reason from premisses predicating
 7      I,  13|       the geometer’s to know the reason why.~
 8      I,  19|         though not real, one can reason through it and complete
 9      I,  24|            5) Our search for the reason ceases, and we think that
10      I,  24|     having full knowledge of the reason why he came.~If, then, all
11      I,  24|          property for no further reason, at this point we have full
12      I,  24|       that this is an additional reason for preferring commensurately
13      I,  31|       light passing through, the reason of the kindling would be
14      I,  33|       the reasoned fact, and the reason is the middle term; so that,
15     II,  1 |          a fact, (2) what is the reason of the connexion, (3) whether
16     II,  1 |         know the fact we ask the reason; as, for example, when we
17     II,  1 |        is in progress, it is the reason of eclipse or earthquake
18     II,  2 |        are proceeding to ask the reason of the connexion or the
19     II,  2 |      nature of the thing and the reason of the fact are identical:
20     II,  2 |        the question "What is the reason of eclipse?" or "Why does
21     II,  2 |     either as to the fact or the reason, but both fact and reason
22     II,  2 |        reason, but both fact and reason would be obvious simultaneously.
23     II,  2 |          s nature is to know the reason why it is; and this is equally
24     II,  5 |          to a question as to the reason for it, so definitions reached
25     II,  8 |      aware of a fact we seek its reason, and though sometimes the
26     II,  8 |       sometimes the fact and the reason dawn on us simultaneously,
27     II,  8 |          we cannot apprehend the reason a moment sooner than the
28     II,  8 |      immediate, we know fact and reason together; if they are not
29     II,  8 |        know the fact without the reason, as in the following example:
30     II,  8 |        moon is eclipsed, but the reason why is not yet clear, and
31     II,  8 |        and we proceed to ask the reason of this fact, we are inquiring
32     II,  10|  triangle exists, we inquire the reason why it exists. But it is
33     II,  11|         preservation. To ask the reason why one must walk after
34     II,  12|          posterior event that we reason (and this though these later
35     II,  12|         is coming-to-be we still reason from the posterior event),
36     II,  12|         from the event we cannot reason (we cannot argue that because
37     II,  12|     occurrence is future)-cannot reason because, be the time interval
38     II,  12|     future event will occur. The reason of this is that the middle
39     II,  12|        indivisible. For the same reason a past event and a present
40     II,  12|         quarried and shaped. The reason is that a house having been
41     II,  13|      genera-this for the further reason too that equivocation is
42     II,  14|          in C and E for the same reason: and throughout the remaining
43     II,  16| Supposing, for example, that the reason why trees are deciduous
44     II,  17|        which is incidentally the reason why all the sciences are