Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  3 |           holding that it is only possible by demonstration, but they
 2      I,  3 |      demonstration is clearly not possible in the unqualified sense
 3      I,  3 |          demonstration", but only possible if "demonstration" be extended
 4      I,  3 |           another and in A, it is possible, as has been shown in my
 5      I,  3 |           either no conclusion is possible, or at least none which
 6      I,  4 |          figure. For though it is possible to show that a figure has
 7      I,  6 |            Where demonstration is possible, one who can give no account
 8      I,  6 |         perish, this situation is possible and might occur. But such
 9      I,  7 |     certain cases transference is possible I will explain later.~Arithmetical
10      I,  12|   attributes: but sometimes it is possible, though the possibility
11      I,  14|         affirmative conclusion is possible, and knowledge of a thing’
12      I,  15| indifferently, since syllogism is possible if either is contained in
13      I,  15|       stated when and how this is possible.~
14      I,  16|     syllogism. Now, two cases are possible. Either (a) both premisses,
15      I,  16|         universal attribution was possible in any figure but the first.
16      I,  16|         are false.~(d) It is also possible when one is false. This
17      I,  16|       erroneous inference will be possible not only when both premisses
18      I,  18|      particulars; but since it is possible to familiarize the pupil
19      I,  19|          premisses as credible as possible: so that if a middle term
20      I,  19|    questions: the first is, is it possible to start from that which
21      I,  22|      seeing that if definition is possible, or in other words, if essential
22      I,  22|   consequent. Therefore, if it is possible through demonstration to
23      I,  23|        demonstration ceases to be possible: we are on the way to the
24      I,  31|       Scientific knowledge is not possible through the act of perception.
25      I,  31|      obvious that even if it were possible to perceive that a triangle
26      I,  32|        though a true inference is possible from false premisses, yet
27      I,  32|         that from the mass of all possible premisses any conclusion
28      I,  32|  mathematical sciences, nor is it possible in analysis, since it is
29      I,  32|         that from the mass of all possible premisses any conclusion
30      I,  33|        are reached; because it is possible to opine not only the fact
31     II,  3 |           to whether or not it is possible to know the same thing in
32     II,  3 |           conclusions as these is possible, there clearly cannot also
33     II,  3 |   identical object of which it is possible to possess both a definition
34     II,  4 |           the definable nature is possible or, as our recent argument
35     II,  4 |           by supposing that it is possible to prove the essential nature
36     II,  6 |     syllogistic inference must be possible even without the express
37     II,  8 |       nature and demonstration is possible, the cause must be the middle
38     II,  9 |          On the other hand, it is possible (in the manner explained)
39     II,  12|      indefinite, it will never be possible to infer that because it
40     II,  12|         coming-to-be; and this is possible only if the middle and extreme
41     II,  13|       Again, division is the only possible method of avoiding the omission
42     II,  17|          of the major term-though possible if the demonstration is
43     II,  17|          not essential. Now it is possible to consider the effect and