Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |          to which the predicate in question belongs commensurately and
 2      I,  7 |           unless the magnitudes in question are numbers. How in certain
 3      I,  10|         province of the science in question.~Peculiar truths are, e.g.
 4      I,  10|          falls within the genus in question: for a truth of this kind
 5      I,  12|                12~If a syllogistic question is equivalent to a proposition
 6      I,  12|           distinctively scientific question, and it is the interrogative
 7      I,  12|            is clear that not every question will be relevant to geometry,
 8      I,  12|  geometrical controversy a musical question is distinctively ungeometrical,
 9      I,  13|    reasoned fact. For example, the question "Why does not a wall breathe?"
10      I,  19|           F, and F to B. The first question is, must this series terminate,
11      I,  19|            to infinity? The second question is as follows: Suppose nothing
12      I,  19|       descend to infinity? A third question is, if the extreme terms
13      I,  19|       attributes-and we raised the question in both cases-are infinite
14      I,  23|           containing the middle in question, and they are identical
15      I,  23|         term whose inherence is in question; e.g. to prove through a
16      I,  24|       affirmative or negative; the question arises, which form is the
17      I,  24|           the better? And the same question may be put in regard to
18      I,  24|            there still remains the question "Why has isosceles this
19     II,  1 |                     1~THE kinds of question we ask are as many as the
20     II,  1 |          the thing. Thus, when our question concerns a complex of thing
21     II,  1 |           have a different kind of question to ask, such as whether
22     II,  2 |        then, are the four kinds of question we ask, and it is in the
23     II,  2 |           does the moon wax?", the question concerns a part of the thing’
24     II,  2 |          moon or night exists, the question concerns the unqualified
25     II,  2 |            that there is, our next question is, "What, then, is this
26     II,  2 |            fact are identical: the question "What is eclipse?" and its
27     II,  2 |             are identical with the question "What is the reason of eclipse?"
28     II,  4 |          next step is to raise the question whether syllogism-i.e. demonstration-of
29     II,  4 |        reciprocating terms beg the question. It would be begging the
30     II,  4 |            It would be begging the question, for example, to contend
31     II,  4 |             for one has begged the question.~
32     II,  5 |    conclusion must not be put as a question nor depend on a concession,
33     II,  5 |    dividendum-must without further question be (ultimately) incapable
34     II,  5 |         the premisses is open to a question as to the reason for it,
35     II,  5 |           division invite the same question.~Thus to the question "What
36     II,  5 |         same question.~Thus to the question "What is the essential nature
37     II,  6 |   hypothetical proof also begs the question. If evil is definable as
38     II,  6 | essentially to be indivisible. The question is begged because definable
39     II,  6 |          described are open to the question why man should be animal-biped-terrestrial
40     II,  14|          horned character-the next question is, to what species does
41     II,  16|                             16~The question might be raised with regard
42     II,  17|          generically one. Take the question why proportionals alternate.