Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 | knowledge must be true, primary, immediate, better known than and prior
 2      I,  2 |         in a demonstration is an immediate proposition. An immediate
 3      I,  2 |        immediate proposition. An immediate proposition is one which
 4      I,  2 |         is a negation. I call an immediate basic truth of syllogism
 5      I,  3 |       contrary, knowledge of the immediate premisses is independent
 6      I,  3 |          the regress must end in immediate truths, those truths must
 7      I,  6 |       the reasoned fact and from immediate premisses.~Of accidents
 8      I,  9 |        true, indemonstrable, and immediate premisses does not constitute
 9      I,  13|         of the syllogism are not immediate (for then the proximate
10      I,  13|           when the premisses are immediate, but instead of the cause
11      I,  14|      intervals closepacked until immediate premisses are reached.~Clearly,
12      I,  16|          asserting a predicate’s immediate connexion with or disconnexion
13      I,  17|       occur, in the case both of immediate and of demonstrable truths.~
14      I,  19|  attribute B—i.e. so that B-C is immediate; suppose further E related
15      I,  21|       interval B-C we must reach immediate propositions—as is always
16      I,  22|        mean that no interval was immediate and indivisible, but that
17      I,  23|    subjects, since there must be immediate intervals. Yet if the attribute
18      I,  23|   derived from the same group of immediate premisses; for we have seen
19      I,  23|    middle terms, seeing that the immediate propositions-or at least
20      I,  23|    propositions-or at least such immediate propositions as are universal-are
21      I,  23|         when the premiss becomes immediate, since the immediate premiss
22      I,  23|     becomes immediate, since the immediate premiss alone is a single
23      I,  23|         syllogism the unit is an immediate premiss, and in the knowledge
24      I,  24|        nothing is so near as the immediate premiss which is itself
25      I,  25|       syllogism is the universal immediate premiss, and the universal
26      I,  32|        analysis, since it is the immediate premisses which are the
27      I,  32|         by the addition of a new immediate premiss: but if it be admitted
28      I,  32|         that it is these primary immediate premisses which are basic
29      I,  33|     which is the grasping of the immediate premiss. Since then rational
30      I,  33|      grasp of a premiss which is immediate but not necessary. This
31      I,  33|      same middle terms until the immediate premisses are reached; because
32      I,  33|     opinion, if obtained through immediate premisses, will be both
33     II,  8 |     answer, if the premisses are immediate, we know fact and reason
34     II,  8 |        together; if they are not immediate, we know the fact without
35     II,  9 |      essential natures which are immediate, that is are basic premisses;
36     II,  12|         major terms must form an immediate premiss; e.g. we argue that,
37     II,  12|       the series terminate in an immediate premiss, or since, as we
38     II,  12|     contiguous". But here too an immediate basic premiss must be assumed.
39     II,  12|       rule-will also derive from immediate basic premisses.~
40     II,  18|                            18~If immediate premisses are not reached
41     II,  19|          a man knows the primary immediate premisses. But there are
42     II,  19|        the apprehension of these immediate premisses: one might not