Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |            Thus, we assume that every predicate can be either truly affirmed
 2      I,  1 |             you know to be such": the predicate is always construed as applicable
 3      I,  2 |        contradiction which conjoins a predicate with a subject is an affirmation;
 4      I,  4 |          not-odd. So, since any given predicate must be either affirmed
 5      I,  4 |            first subject to which the predicate in question belongs commensurately
 6      I,  4 |               essential sense, of any predicate is the proof of it as belonging
 7      I,  6 |              and let B be a necessary predicate of C; then A too will be
 8      I,  6 |               too will be a necessary predicate of C, which by hypothesis
 9      I,  8 | commensurately universal, because the predicate will be predicable of some
10      I,  11|               simultaneously the same predicate of the same subject is not
11      I,  11|           term of which it is true to predicate man-even if it be also true
12      I,  11|        man-even if it be also true to predicate not-man of it—still grant
13      I,  11|              term.~The law that every predicate can be either truly affirmed
14      I,  12|               whole of the minor (the predicate of course never has the
15      I,  12|               odd number. We can then predicate A of C. Next let D represent
16      I,  13|            Therefore A is a necessary predicate of C; so that we have demonstrated
17      I,  16|              propositions asserting a predicate’s immediate connexion with
18      I,  19|            start from that which is a predicate but not itself a subject
19      I,  19|                since when subject and predicate are convertible there is
20      I,  21|               be a subject of which a predicate is affirmed. Next, since
21      I,  21|               C, then D has a further predicate which is denied of C. Therefore,
22      I,  22|              as types respectively of predicate and subject.~We shall assume,
23      I,  22|          shall assume, then, that the predicate is invariably predicated
24      I,  22|              of a single subject, the predicate must affirm of the subject
25      I,  22|         subject is identical with the predicate or with a species of the
26      I,  22|              or with a species of the predicate. Predicates not signifying
27      I,  22|               or differentia of A-the predicate now become subject. But
28      I,  22|             terminate, and beyond any predicate taken as higher than another
29      I,  22|              still higher, then every predicate is demonstrable. Consequently,
30      I,  23|           condensed until subject and predicate become indivisible, i.e.
31      I,  24|           predication, viz. where the predicate signifies not substance
32      I,  29|            can then without falsehood predicate D of B and A of D, for he
33      I,  29|       property changes. Again, we can predicate A of G without falsehood,
34     II,  3 |          every demonstration proves a predicate of a subject as attaching
35     II,  3 |              another; we do not, e.g. predicate animal of biped nor biped
36     II,  4 |                So both premisses will predicate essence, and consequently
37     II,  4 |          therefore, both premisses do predicate essence-i.e. definable form-C’
38     II,  10|          because it exhibits a single predicate as inhering not accidentally
39     II,  13|         accepts one of the two as its predicate. Next we have taken the