Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |      essential" attribute.~I term "commensurately universal" an attribute
 2      I,  4 |       angles.~An attribute belongs commensurately and universally to a subject
 3      I,  4 |          two right angles is not a commensurately universal attribute of figure.
 4      I,  4 |      predicate in question belongs commensurately and universally, and the
 5      I,  4 |    belonging to this first subject commensurately and universally: while the
 6      I,  4 |     equality to two right angles a commensurately universal attribute of isosceles;
 7      I,  5 |            not in fact primary and commensurately universal in the sense in
 8      I,  5 |         this subject primarily and commensurately and universally. When a
 9      I,  5 |            a subject primarily and commensurately and universally, that is
10      I,  5 |      To-day, however, the proof is commensurately universal, for they do not
11      I,  5 |         triangle has this property commensurately and universally, even if
12      I,  5 |          demonstrated as belonging commensurately and universally?)" Clearly
13      I,  5 |          demonstrated as belonging commensurately and universally.~
14      I,  8 |         the syllogism proceeds are commensurately universal, the conclusion
15      I,  8 |          perishable subject is not commensurately universal but temporary
16      I,  8 |         must be perishable and not commensurately universal (perishable because
17      I,  8 |      conclusion be perishable; not commensurately universal, because the predicate
18      I,  8 |          is true at the moment-not commensurately and universally. The same
19      I,  24|       demonstrations may be either commensurately universal or particular,
20      I,  24|           Let us first examine the commensurately universal and the particular
21      I,  24|            in all other cases. But commensurately universal demonstration,
22      I,  24|         particular rather than the commensurately universal forms demonstrates,
23      I,  24|   unrealities and is delusory. Now commensurately universal demonstration
24      I,  24|           the cause). Consequently commensurately universal demonstration
25      I,  24|           our knowledge has become commensurately universal, and so we conclude
26      I,  24|            and so we conclude that commensurately universal demonstration
27      I,  24|         only one. He who possesses commensurately universal demonstration
28      I,  24|   additional reason for preferring commensurately universal demonstration.
29      I,  24|        less closely dependent. But commensurately universal demonstration
30      I,  24|    indication of the precedence of commensurately universal demonstration
31      I,  24| potentially or actually. Moreover, commensurately universal demonstration
32      I,  25|      defence of the superiority of commensurately universal to particular
33      I,  31|            time: but that which is commensurately universal and true in all
34      I,  31|           it were, it would not be commensurately universal-the term we apply
35      I,  31|            that demonstrations are commensurately universal and universals
36      I,  33|            scientific knowledge is commensurately universal and proceeds by
37     II,  16|           species, universally and commensurately to those species-i.e. either