Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |  demonstration. By demonstration I mean a syllogism productive of
 2      I,  2 |         and better known to man. I mean that objects nearer to sense
 3      I,  2 |       knowledge must be primary, I mean that they must be the "appropriate"
 4      I,  4 | preliminary, let us define what we mean by an attribute "true in
 5      I,  5 |             that is to be taken to mean that it is true of a given
 6      I,  11|          of the genus-the genus, I mean (as I have already explained),
 7      I,  11|        elements of demonstration-I mean the common axioms which
 8      I,  17|          By "appropriate middle" I mean the middle term through
 9      I,  19|          an infinity of middles? I mean this: suppose for example
10      I,  20|           direction (by "upward" I mean the ascent to the more universal,
11      I,  21|         term (by "ultimate term" I mean a term such as was, not
12      I,  21|          term (by "primary term" I mean a term predicable of a subject
13      I,  22|             the white is a log", I mean that something which happens
14      I,  22|            log is white", I do not mean that something else, which
15      I,  22|    musician is white," which would mean "the man who happens also
16      I,  22|          to number, for this would mean the inherence in odd of
17      I,  22|          were not a fact, it would mean that no interval was immediate
18      I,  27|        additional elements. What I mean by "additional elements"
19      I,  32|            this occurs once only-I mean if A for instance, is truly
20      I,  32|          the common axioms-such, I mean, as the law of excluded
21      I,  32|     medicine"; would the statement mean anything except that the
22      I,  32|         have the same basic truths mean that from the mass of all
23      I,  33|  intuition-by rational intuition I mean an originative source of
24     II,  1 |          God. (By "is or is not" I mean "is or is not, without further
25     II,  2 |  unqualified being of the thing, I mean that if we ask "does the
26     II,  2 |            without qualification I mean the subject, e.g. moon or
27     II,  2 |            in the partial sense) I mean a property, e.g. eclipse,
28     II,  3 |         demonstration. It might, I mean, be urged that definition
29     II,  13|         attributes of wider extent mean all such as are universal
30     II,  17|       which A can be predicated? I mean how can there fail to be