Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |          a subject always itself inheres in the subject more firmly
 2      I,  6 |         or the other necessarily inheres.) It follows from this that
 3      I,  6 |      which, though A necessarily inheres in C, yet B, the middle
 4      I,  9 |       term in virtue of which it inheres, and as an inference from
 5      I,  9 |         that subject in which it inheres essentially, and as inferred
 6      I,  19| syllogism serves to prove that A inheres in C by showing that A inheres
 7      I,  19|   inheres in C by showing that A inheres in B and B in C; the other
 8      I,  19|     bound to follow-proof that A inheres in C through B, and again
 9      I,  19|      through B, and again that A inheres in B through some other
10      I,  19|       term, and similarly that B inheres in C. If our reasoning aims
11      I,  19|       suppose for example that A inheres in C and B is intermediate
12      I,  22|          substratum in which log inheres, for it was not qua white
13      I,  23|          if the same attribute A inheres in two terms C and D predicable
14      I,  23|      middle in virtue of which A inheres in C and D, clearly B would
15      I,  23|          that a single attribute inheres in several subjects, since
16      I,  23|        is also clear that when A inheres in B, this can be demonstrated
17      I,  23|      this is that" or that "this inheres in that", so there are others
18      I,  23|      this is that" or that "this inheres in that"-in fact some basic
19      I,  24|      when an attribute no longer inheres because of something else.
20      I,  26|       inhere, and further that B inheres in C, with the resulting
21      I,  26|       resulting inference that A inheres in C. This we have to suppose
22     II,  4 |    another: and further (2) if A inheres in the essence of all B
23     II,  11|        which A, the final cause, inheres in C? It is B, the non-regurgitation
24     II,  13|     subject not a triad-as being inheres in triad but also in subjects
25     II,  14|       virtue of what character B inheres in D-namely A-and that it
26     II,  14|        in D-namely A-and that it inheres in C and E for the same
27     II,  16|         leaves, C vine. Now if A inheres in B (for every broad-leaved
28     II,  16| possessing broad leaves); then A inheres in C (every vine is deciduous),
29     II,  16|        deciduous, F vine. Then E inheres in F (since every vine is
30     II,  16|       primary subject in which A inheres, and C another primary subject