Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |            only learnt in this way, i.e. there is here no recognition
 2      I,  1 |         have demonstrated evenness, i.e. what they made the subject
 3      I,  2 |             part of an enunciation, i.e. it predicates a single attribute
 4      I,  2 |            other of an enunciation, i.e. asserts either the existence
 5      I,  3 |        without qualification prior, i.e. the method by which induction
 6      I,  5 |           essence with equilateral, i.e. with each or all equilaterals,
 7      I,  5 |             it belongs is primary? (i.e. to what subject can it be
 8      I,  7 |            a genus; (2) the axioms, i.e. axioms which are premisses
 9      I,  7 |     subject-genus whose attributes, i.e. essential properties, are
10      I,  7 |           do not possess qua lines, i.e. in virtue of the fundamental
11      I,  8 |              the conclusion of such i.e. in the unqualified sense-must
12      I,  12|         geometry? It is this error, i.e. error based on premisses
13      I,  19|          subject of the attribute B—i.e. so that B-C is immediate;
14      I,  19| demonstrations proceed to infinity, i.e. is everything demonstrable?
15      I,  21|             is not C. This premiss, i.e. C-B, will be proved either
16      I,  22|          predicated of one another, i.e. B would become the genus
17      I,  23|       predicate become indivisible, i.e. one. We have our unit when
18      I,  24|         single identical definition i.e. if the commensurate universal
19      I,  24|    syllogism that proves the cause, i.e. the reasoned fact, and it
20      I,  29|        middles which are different, i.e. not in the same series-yet
21     II,  2 |            a thing is this or that, i.e. has or has not this or that
22     II,  2 |             is-not is this or that, i.e. has this or that attribute,
23     II,  6 |             is, but hypothetically, i.e. by premising (1) that its
24     II,  9 |       things which have a "middle", i.e. a cause of their substantial
25     II,  11|             A is attributable to C, i.e. that the angle in a semicircle
26     II,  12|      applies also to future events; i.e. one cannot infer from an
27     II,  13|           and prime in both senses, i.e. not only as possessing no
28     II,  13|         them all is the definition, i.e. the simple infirma species,
29     II,  16|            effect must reciprocate, i.e. be convertible. Supposing,
30     II,  18|         middle but several middles, i.e. several causes; is the cause