Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |                                     1~ALL instruction given or
 2      I,  4 |           Essential attributes are (1) such as belong to their
 3      I,  4 |        shown to belong. Thus, e.g. (1) the equality of its angles
 4      I,  5 |           so. We make this mistake (1) when the subject is an
 5      I,  5 |             another. An example of (1) would be as follows: if
 6      I,  6 |             a proposition which is (1) popularly accepted and (
 7      I,  6 |             possess knowledge. For (1) popular acceptance or rejection
 8      I,  7 |         elements in demonstration: (1) what is proved, the conclusion-an
 9      I,  10|        science has three elements: (1) that which it posits, the
10      I,  13|           science and in two ways: (1) when the premisses of the
11      I,  13|             fact. This also occurs (1) when the middle falls outside
12      I,  16|             produced by inference.~(1) Let us first consider propositions
13      I,  22|         prefatory remarks to make. (1) We can affirm without falsehood "
14      I,  23|      syllogisms on the other hand, (1) in the first figure nothing
15      I,  24|          particular demonstration.~(1) The superior demonstration
16      I,  24| demonstration.~We may retort thus. (1) The first argument applies
17      I,  25|           may be shown as follows.~(1) We may assume the superiority
18      I,  32|        dialectical considerations. (1) Some syllogisms are true
19      I,  33|  simultaneously apprehending, e.g. (1) that man is essentially
20     II,  1 |                                     1~THE kinds of question we
21     II,  1 |             They are in fact four:-(1) whether the connexion of
22     II,  4 |          essence. But in that case (1) the subject, its definition,
23     II,  6 |  hypothetically, i.e. by premising (1) that its definable form
24     II,  7 |           strange consequence; for (1) both what is not substance
25     II,  8 |          acting as a screen. Thus, (1) "What is thunder?" "The
26     II,  10|           has therefore made plain (1) in what sense and of what
27     II,  11|             there are four causes: (1) the definable form, (2)
28     II,  11|           shines through a lantern (1) because that which consists
29     II,  13|             three objects in view: (1) the admission only of elements