Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |            they use either example, a kind of induction, or enthymeme,
 2      I,  5 |             even if one prove of each kind of triangle that its angles
 3      I,  9 |              to subjects different in kind. They therefore afford knowledge
 4      I,  9 |               must belong to the same kind as the major and minor terms.
 5      I,  10|         question: for a truth of this kind will have the same force
 6      I,  11|              other axioms of the same kind. Dialectic has no definite
 7      I,  11|               definite sphere of this kind, not being confined to a
 8      I,  12|    science-geometry for instance-what kind of error is it that may
 9      I,  13|       breathes. A syllogism with this kind of cause takes place in
10      I,  19|             means of three terms. One kind of syllogism serves to prove
11      I,  22|             let us entitle the latter kind of statement predication,
12      I,  22|      definition of number. In neither kind of attribution can the terms
13      I,  23|               they are both a certain kind of figure, and not in so
14      I,  24|        demonstration is of the latter kind: if we engage in it we find
15      I,  24|               of the prior, we have a kind of knowledge-a potential
16      I,  32|              false and true differ in kind. Then again, (2) falsehoods
17      I,  33|               unstable, and so is the kind of being we have described
18     II,  1 |           inquiry we have a different kind of question to ask, such
19     II,  7 |             be definitions, since any kind of sentence could be given
20     II,  10|               s nature, obviously one kind of definition will be a
21     II,  10|          defining definition. Another kind of definition is a formula
22     II,  11| non-regurgitation of food; but B is a kind of definition of A, for
23     II,  12|           observe in Nature a certain kind of circular process of coming-to-be;
24     II,  19|             whether it is of the same kind as the apprehension of the
25     II,  19|             of the former a different kind of knowledge; and, further,
26     II,  19|               true: further, no other kind of thought except intuition
27     II,  19|       therefore, it is the only other kind of true thinking except