Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  3 |           circular demonstration is impossible except in the case of attributes
 2      I,  3 |            is clearly frivolous and impossible to say that demonstration
 3      I,  4 |           their subjects. For it is impossible for them not to inhere in
 4      I,  6 |          may also not inhere, it is impossible to prove its inherence as
 5      I,  7 |             transference is clearly impossible, because the extreme and
 6      I,  11|            so demonstration becomes impossible. We conclude, then, that
 7      I,  11|     individuals.~The law that it is impossible to affirm and deny simultaneously
 8      I,  12|          Sometimes, no doubt, it is impossible to reason from premisses
 9      I,  16|            wholly true. But this is impossible. On the other hand, there
10      I,  18|        isolation-it is consequently impossible to come to grasp universals
11      I,  18|         induction. But induction is impossible for those who have not sense-perception.
12      I,  20|         that if these processes are impossible there cannot be an infinity
13      I,  22|       otherwise definition would be impossible. Hence, if all the attributes
14      I,  22|              an infinite regress is impossible; since if either (a) or (
15      I,  22|          any two terms; but this is impossible if both the ascending and
16      I,  26|   questioned, A’s inherence in B is impossible.~The order of the terms
17      I,  26|           known, we use reductio ad impossible; when the major premiss
18     II,  3 |             demonstration of it, an impossible consequence will follow:-
19     II,  3 |      partially the same? Or is that impossible, because there can be no
20     II,  4 |            recent argument assumed, impossible.~We might argue it impossible
21     II,  4 |       impossible.~We might argue it impossible on the following grounds:-(
22     II,  7 |      whether it exists. But that is impossible.~Moreover it is clear, if
23     II,  13|         existence. Yet some hold it impossible to know the differentiae
24     II,  17|           but different? Or is that impossible? Perhaps it is impossible
25     II,  17|           impossible? Perhaps it is impossible if the effect is demonstrated
26     II,  19|            through demonstration is impossible unless a man knows the primary
27     II,  19| pre-existent knowledge? For that is impossible, as we used to find in the