Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |           cause of an attribute’s inherence in a subject always itself
 2      I,  6 |           impossible to prove its inherence as a necessary conclusion.
 3      I,  13|       affirmation of x causes the inherence of y; e.g. if the disproportion
 4      I,  13|         assertion of x causes the inherence of y, the negation of x
 5      I,  22|          Demonstration proves the inherence of essential attributes
 6      I,  22|           for this would mean the inherence in odd of another attribute
 7      I,  23| syllogisms, then, which prove the inherence of an attribute, nothing
 8      I,  23|      outside the major term whose inherence is in question; e.g. to
 9      I,  24|           itself the cause of the inherence, and the commensurate universal
10      I,  25|         two demonstrations of the inherence of A in E, the one proving
11      I,  26|          inhere in B. Thus if the inherence of B in C is not questioned,
12      I,  26|          C is not questioned, A’s inherence in B is impossible.~The
13      I,  33|       judgements, but the mode of inherence differs.~This also shows
14     II,  13|           as one can conclude the inherence of an accident through the
15     II,  16|          will be the cause of A’s inherence in D, C of A’s inherence
16     II,  16|          inherence in D, C of A’s inherence in E. The presence of the
17     II,  17|       Thus, B is the cause of A’s inherence in the species of D: consequently
18     II,  17|      should B be the cause of A’s inherence in D any more than A the
19     II,  17|           than A the cause of B’s inherence in D? Now if A is an attribute
20     II,  17|         some special cause of A’s inherence in E, as there was of A’
21     II,  17|         in E, as there was of A’s inherence in all the species of D?
22     II,  18|           cause of the property’s inherence in the several species the
23     II,  18|   formally: C is the cause of B’s inherence in D; hence C is the cause
24     II,  18|       hence C is the cause of A’s inherence in D, B of A’s inherence
25     II,  18|          inherence in D, B of A’s inherence in C, while the cause of
26     II,  18|            while the cause of A’s inherence in B is B itself.~