Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  5 |            logic, is the method of division a process of inference at
 2     II,  5 |            of certain other facts: division demonstrates as little as
 3     II,  5 |       presented with an exhaustive division of animal into terrestrial
 4     II,  5 |          an assumption whether the division comprises many differentiae
 5     II,  5 |           Indeed as this method of division is used by those who proceed
 6     II,  5 | substantial being?~The champion of division might here urge that though
 7     II,  5 |           the genus, we produce by division the requisite uninterrupted
 8     II,  5 |       divided falls whole into the division at each stage, and none
 9     II,  5 |        incapable of fresh specific division. Nevertheless, we reply,
10     II,  5 |            Nevertheless, we reply, division does not involve inference;
11     II,  5 |     demonstration any more than is division, et it does make evident
12     II,  5 |            a definition reached by division is not to state a conclusion:
13     II,  5 |          so definitions reached by division invite the same question.~
14     II,  5 |            as he thinks, proves by division, that all animal is mortal
15     II,  5 |        definition; so that even if division does demonstrate its formula,
16     II,  6 |        major.~Again, both proof by division and the syllogism just described
17     II,  13|            assumption made without division. But, in fact, the order
18     II,  13|        necessarily been reached by division. Again, division is the
19     II,  13|        reached by division. Again, division is the only possible method
20     II,  13|           not fall whole into this division: e.g. it is not all animal
21     II,  13|    Moreover, to postulate that the division exhausts the genus is not
22     II,  13|       establishing a definition by division one should keep three objects
23     II,  13|        comes first in the order of division, pointing out that animal,
24     II,  13|         this totality admits of no division into species. For it is
25     II,  13|            concrete would admit of division into species, which, we