| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] conjunctions 4 connected 12 connecting 1 connexion 25 connexions 17 consecutive 1 consequence 4 | Frequency [« »] 26 inhere 26 inherence 26 opinion 25 connexion 25 division 25 taken 24 conclusions | Aristotle Posterior Analytics IntraText - Concordances connexion |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 2 | conviction of them than of the connexion which is being demonstrated: 2 I, 4 | there is a consequential connexion, the predication is essential; 3 I, 6 | conclusion is a necessary connexion. Either he will mistake 4 I, 6 | conclusion is not a necessary connexion, such and such determinate 5 I, 8 | because the attribute’s connexion with its perishable subject 6 I, 9 | knowledge of any attribute’s connexion with a subject is accidental 7 I, 9 | accidental unless we know that connexion through the middle term 8 I, 15| since in that case the connexion or disconnexion will not 9 I, 16| a predicate’s immediate connexion with or disconnexion from 10 I, 16| one directly believes a connexion or disconnexion as well 11 I, 24| follows that he who knows a connexion universally has greater 12 I, 29| demonstrations of the same connexion not only by taking from 13 I, 33| opines when he thinks that a connexion, though actually so, may 14 II, 1 | fact four:-(1) whether the connexion of an attribute with a thing 15 II, 1 | what is the reason of the connexion, (3) whether a thing exists, ( 16 II, 1 | asking as to the fact of a connexion. That our inquiry ceases 17 II, 2 | Now when we ask whether a connexion is a fact, or whether a 18 II, 2 | really asking whether the connexion or the thing has a "middle"; 19 II, 2 | ascertained either that the connexion is a fact or that the thing 20 II, 2 | to ask the reason of the connexion or the nature of the thing, 21 II, 2 | distinguishing the fact of the connexion and the existence of the 22 II, 3 | as to prove the fact of a connexion. Now definition reveals 23 II, 12| universal. But we have assumed a connexion which is a general rule; 24 II, 16| however, suggest that if the connexion to be proved is always universal 25 II, 17| of the sort-proving the connexion of the first middle with