Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  7 |         related as subordinate to superior (e.g. as optical theorems
 2      I,  9 |        reasoned fact concerns the superior science, to which the attributes
 3      I,  13|        another as subordinate and superior, as when optical problems
 4      I,  24| particular demonstration.~(1) The superior demonstration is the demonstration
 5      I,  24|         possesses an attribute is superior. If this is so, and if the
 6      I,  24|       particular demonstration is superior.~(2) The universal has not
 7      I,  24|           and will not mislead is superior to that which moves among
 8      I,  24|     commensurate and universal is superior to particular demonstration.~(
 9      I,  24|        universal demonstration is superior as more especially proving
10      I,  24|        universal demonstration is superior.~(6) The more demonstration
11      I,  24|       truly demonstration, is the superior.~(7) Demonstration which
12      I,  24|      dependence, and is therefore superior. Thus, if A had to be proved
13      I,  25|         from fewer assumptions is superior may be set out in universal
14      I,  25|      premisses is ceteris paribus superior. Now both affirmative and
15      I,  25|         and more certain, will be superior.~(3) The basic truth of
16      I,  25|      affirmative demonstration is superior to that of negative demonstration,
17      I,  25|          demonstration which uses superior basic premisses is superior.~(
18      I,  25|       superior basic premisses is superior.~(4) Affirmative demonstration
19      I,  26|      affirmative demonstration is superior to negative, it is clearly
20      I,  26|           negative, it is clearly superior also to reductio ad impossibile.
21      I,  26|           to one another. Now the superior demonstration is that which
22      I,  26|  affirmative demonstration, being superior to negative, will consequently
23      I,  26|    negative, will consequently be superior also to reductio ad impossibile.~