Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |           is of two kinds. In some cases admission of the fact must
 2      I,  1 | Recognition of a truth may in some cases contain as factors both
 3      I,  7 |            numbers. How in certain cases transference is possible
 4      I,  9 |   exceptions to this rule are such cases as theorems in harmonics
 5      I,  12|          applicable to a number of cases (otherwise it will not be
 6      I,  13|           A waxing.) Again (b), in cases where the cause and the
 7      I,  14|     generally speaking and in most cases in this figure-a second
 8      I,  16|    produced by syllogism. Now, two cases are possible. Either (a)
 9      I,  16|       contrary was posited in both cases, both premisses will be
10      I,  17|     premisses error will result in cases where the erroneous conclusion
11      I,  19|            I say, because in these cases too either the series of
12      I,  21|           terminates in both these cases may be made clear by the
13      I,  22|     affirmation differs in the two cases. When I affirm "the white
14      I,  24|        argument holds in all other cases. But commensurately universal
15      I,  24|           supposition in the other cases of unequivocal universal
16      I,  25|     follows. Assuming that in both cases alike the middle terms are
17      I,  31|          universal and true in all cases one cannot perceive, since
18      I,  31|        sense-perception: there are cases when an act of vision would
19     II,  2 |            then, is their ratio?".~Cases in which the "middle" is
20     II,  11|           there are very many such cases, mostly among the processes
21     II,  11|           as well.~It is mostly in cases where the issue is indeterminate (
22     II,  12|            are future. But what of cases where they are not simultaneous?
23     II,  13|          should next examine other cases, Lysander, for example,