Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |            an enunciation, i.e. it predicates a single attribute of a
 2      I,  19|          are naturally subjects of predicates. Suppose, then, C such a
 3      I,  19|            not itself a subject of predicates, and descend to infinity?
 4      I,  21|            since the succession of predicates affirmed of an ever higher
 5      I,  21|      terminates, the succession of predicates denied terminates too.~The
 6      I,  22|                  22~In the case of predicates constituting the essential
 7      I,  22|        series cannot be traversed, predicates constituting a thing’s essential
 8      I,  22|          in number. But as regards predicates generally we have the following
 9      I,  22|     passive, placed, or dated.~(2) Predicates which signify substance
10      I,  22|          species of the predicate. Predicates not signifying substance
11      I,  22|           species of animal. These predicates which do not signify substance
12      I,  22|          signify substance must be predicates of some other subject, and
13      I,  22|  demonstrations are concerned with predicates such as we have defined.~(
14      I,  22| predications neither the ascending predicates nor the descending subjects
15      I,  22|            since a substance whose predicates were infinite would not
16      I,  22|          predication; for all such predicates are coincidents and are
17      I,  22|       attribute, and secondly that predicates which are not substantial
18      I,  22|           assume this because such predicates are all coincidents, and
19      I,  22|         alternative proof follows. Predicates so related to their subjects
20      I,  22|      subjects that there are other predicates prior to them predicable
21      I,  22|           since these demonstrable predicates are infinite in number and
22     II,  6 |           does not ensure that the predicates shall constitute a genuine