Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |                On the other hand, any isosceles triangle has its angles
 2      I,  4 |              to two right angles, yet isosceles triangle is not the primary
 3      I,  4 | commensurately universal attribute of isosceles; it is of wider application.~
 4      I,  5 |               would be as follows: if isosceles were the only triangle,
 5      I,  5 |               to two right angles qua isosceles. An instance of (2) would
 6      I,  5 |             equilateral, scalene, and isosceles, one does not yet know,
 7      I,  5 |      demonstrated qua triangle or qua isosceles? What is the point at which
 8      I,  5 |           Thus the angles of a brazen isosceles triangle are equal to two
 9      I,  5 |              but eliminate brazen and isosceles and the attribute remains. "
10      I,  23|              of a common middle term. Isosceles and scalene possess the
11      I,  24|              attempting to prove that isosceles is x, it proves not that
12      I,  24|              is x, it proves not that isosceles but only that triangle is
13      I,  24|   attributable to its subject not qua isosceles but qua triangle, he who
14      I,  24|           triangle, he who knows that isosceles possesses that attribute
15      I,  24|               to all triangles, it is isosceles qua triangle and not triangle
16      I,  24|         triangle and not triangle qua isosceles which has its angles so
17      I,  24|             the exterior angles of an isosceles, there still remains the
18      I,  24|         remains the question "Why has isosceles this attribute?" and its
19      I,  24|            sense-potentially-that the isosceles’ angles also are equal to
20      I,  24|            one does not know that the isosceles is a triangle; but to grasp
21     II,  3 |              been proved to attach to isosceles; for isosceles is a part
22     II,  3 |              attach to isosceles; for isosceles is a part of which all triangles