Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |          the sense that he knows universally. If this distinction is
 2      I,  4 |       belongs commensurately and universally to a subject when it can
 3      I,  4 |       belongs commensurately and universally, and the demonstration,
 4      I,  4 |       subject commensurately and universally: while the proof of it as
 5      I,  5 | primarily and commensurately and universally. When a demonstration is
 6      I,  5 | primarily and commensurately and universally, that is to be taken to
 7      I,  5 |         postulated as possessing universally. Hence, even if one prove
 8      I,  5 |      property commensurately and universally, even if there is no other
 9      I,  5 |     belonging commensurately and universally?)" Clearly this point is
10      I,  5 |     belonging commensurately and universally.~
11      I,  8 |    moment-not commensurately and universally. The same is true of definitions,
12      I,  11| impossibile, and then not always universally, but so far as it is requisite;
13      I,  14|         any qualified sense, but universally. Finally, the first figure
14      I,  16|    middle term can be with truth universally affirmed of one extreme
15      I,  16|      affirmed of one extreme and universally denied of the other: but
16      I,  16|   universal attribute of all but universally non-attributable to B, C-A
17      I,  16|         be yet assumed that C is universally non-attributable to A, but
18      I,  24|         he who knows a connexion universally has greater knowledge of
19     II,  4 |        all B and B is predicated universally of all C as belonging to
20     II,  12|           For if A is predicated universally of B and B of C, A too must
21     II,  16|          this whole has species, universally and commensurately to those