Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |   demonstrative knowledge is only present when we have a demonstration,
 2      I,  31|      somewhat", and at a definite present place and time: but that
 3      I,  31|            we should perceive the present fact of the eclipse, but
 4     II,  2 |         universal too; since, the present fact of an eclipse being
 5     II,  2 |         the same time give us the present fact of the earth’s screening
 6     II,  12|           that a past event and a present process cannot be "contiguous",
 7     II,  12|         reason a past event and a present process cannot be "contiguous",
 8     II,  12| indivisible. Thus the relation of present process to past event is
 9     II,  12|       because it is nearer to the present moment, and the starting-point
10     II,  12|     starting-point of time is the present. We next argue that, since
11     II,  12|    consisting of a middle and the present event as major. The like
12     II,  13|    subject one seeks to define is present in one or other of them,
13     II,  16|        whether when the effect is present the cause also is present;
14     II,  16|         present the cause also is present; whether, for instance,
15     II,  16|        moon is eclipsed, there is present also the cause of the eclipse
16     II,  16|       argue, if this cause is not present, these phenomena will have
17     II,  16|        some other cause: if it is present, its effect will be at once
18     II,  16|    deciduous, coagulation must be present, and if coagulation is present-not
19     II,  19|         the earliest universal is present in the soul: for though