Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |   recognition through a middle of a minor term as subject to a major.
 2      I,  6 |  consequentially connected with the minor, and the major with the
 3      I,  9 |          belongs essentially to the minor, the middle must belong
 4      I,  9 |          same kind as the major and minor terms. The only exceptions
 5      I,  11|             middle, or again to the minor term, the corresponding
 6      I,  11| corresponding negative. For grant a minor term of which it is true
 7      I,  12|          middle of the whole of the minor (the predicate of course
 8      I,  12|            that this is so, but the minor premiss "Are epics circles?"
 9      I,  12|            a proof has an inductive minor premiss, one should not
10      I,  12|         attributes of the major and minor terms. An instance of this
11      I,  13|         falls outside the major and minor, for here too the strict
12      I,  16|             negative instead of the minor. Or one premiss may be wholly
13      I,  16|         premiss C-A is true but the minor wholly false. Again, in
14      I,  21|            always the case with the minor premiss—since B-C is affirmative.
15      I,  32|         middle terms or as major or minor terms, or else have some
16      I,  34|           he has seen the major and minor terms and then grasped the
17     II,  6 |           once more assumed in this minor premiss too?~Further, just
18     II,  6 |           the term we assert of the minor is neither the major itself
19     II,  11|          the teleological order the minor, C, must first take place,