Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |  given or received by way of argument proceeds from pre-existent
 2      I,  3 | include that other method of argument which rests on a distinction
 3      I,  6 |      our opponent’s previous argument goes. This shows how naive
 4      I,  6 |     retains the steps of the argument, though there is no change
 5      I,  6 |      retain the steps of the argument, yet he has not knowledge,
 6      I,  12|    such a company an unsound argument will pass unnoticed. This
 7      I,  20|     cannot be taken into the argument at all: whichever terms
 8      I,  22|     to it is predicable.~The argument we have given is one of
 9      I,  24|   man is musical, and a like argument holds in all other cases.
10      I,  24|      well illustrated by the argument that the proportionate is
11      I,  24|   retort thus. (1) The first argument applies no more to commensurate
12      I,  24|    there is yet this further argument:~(8) Proof becomes more
13      I,  25|   that is a desideratum. The argument implied in our contention
14     II,  3 |     to two right angles". An argument proving this difference
15     II,  4 |   possible or, as our recent argument assumed, impossible.~We
16     II,  4 | nature of man. Therefore the argument assumes what it has to prove,
17     II,  6 |   that we have to defend our argument as conforming to the definition
18     II,  12|  will be false. And the same argument applies also to future events;
19     II,  13|    is shown by the following argument. If it is not identical