Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  3 |           or at least none which proves both the original premisses.
 2      I,  12|          himself to geometry and proves anything from geometrical
 3      I,  13|      near. This syllogism, then, proves not the reasoned fact but
 4      I,  13|          of C, and the syllogism proves the reasoned fact, since
 5      I,  22|     investigation. Demonstration proves the inherence of essential
 6      I,  24|    subject itself actually is x, proves only that something else
 7      I,  24|          that isosceles is x, it proves not that isosceles but only
 8      I,  24|         particular demonstration proves that the subject itself
 9      I,  24|  Demonstration is syllogism that proves the cause, i.e. the reasoned
10      I,  25|         D which is A. Thus there proves to be a single negative
11     II,  3 |    Moreover, every demonstration proves a predicate of a subject
12     II,  4 | following grounds:-(a) syllogism proves an attribute of a subject
13     II,  5 |          say, and, as he thinks, proves by division, that all animal
14     II,  7 |     exception, because induction proves not what the essential nature
15     II,  7 |   possessed of some attribute he proves. What is it, then, that
16     II,  7 |    definition, if it in no sense proves essential nature, is a set
17     II,  7 |         neither demonstrates nor proves anything, and that knowledge
18     II,  10|      sense and of what things it proves the essential nature, and