Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |                1~ALL instruction given or received by way of argument
 2      I,  4 |          genus the contrary of a given attribute is either its
 3      I,  4 |        of not-odd. So, since any given predicate must be either
 4      I,  5 |        mean that it is true of a given subject primarily and as
 5      I,  5 |     exemplified. If a proof were given that perpendiculars to the
 6      I,  13|          the strict cause is not given, and so the demonstration
 7      I,  13|   non-inherence. But in the case given this consequence does not
 8      I,  22|         conclude that there is a given subject (D) of which some
 9      I,  22| predicable.~The argument we have given is one of the so-called
10      I,  22|      analytic proof has now been given.~
11      I,  25|       from fewer premisses; for, given that all these are equally
12      I,  31|          different account to be given.) Hence it is clear that
13     II,  3 |     demonstration reveals that a given attribute attaches or does
14     II,  3 |          or does not attach to a given subject; but different things
15     II,  7 |        kind of sentence could be given a name; so that we should
16     II,  13|          species will be clearly given by the definitions of the
17     II,  17|         identical as involving a given determinate increment. In
18     II,  19|          now restate the account given already, though with insufficient