Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |           not.~If he did not in an unqualified sense of the term know the
 2      I,  2 |       suppose ourselves to possess unqualified scientific knowledge of
 3      I,  2 |  Consequently the proper object of unqualified scientific knowledge is
 4      I,  3 |        clearly not possible in the unqualified sense of "demonstration",
 5      I,  3 |         meaning, our definition of unqualified knowledge will prove faulty;
 6      I,  3 |           not demonstration in the unqualified sense of the term.~The advocates
 7      I,  4 |        scientifically known in the unqualified sense of that term, all
 8      I,  5 |       universality, and when it is unqualified knowledge? If triangle be
 9      I,  5 | equilaterals, then clearly we have unqualified knowledge: if on the other
10      I,  8 |     conclusion of such i.e. in the unqualified sense-must also be eternal.
11      I,  22|         through demonstration have unqualified but only hypothetical science
12      I,  23|            a single premiss in the unqualified sense of "single". And as
13      I,  26|         demonstration will have an unqualified superiority to reductio
14     II,  2 |          either the partial or the unqualified being of the thing-and are
15     II,  2 |   respectively the partial and the unqualified being of the thing, I mean
16     II,  2 |          the question concerns the unqualified being of a thing.)~We conclude
17     II,  13|       definition of similarity not unqualified but restricted to colours