Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  22|     conviction, but an analytic process will show more briefly that
 2     II,  5 |        the method of division a process of inference at all, since
 3     II,  7 |     prove them both by the same process, since definition exhibits
 4     II,  12|         because the earth is in process of intervening, will be
 5     II,  12| simultaneously when they are in process of becoming, and exist simultaneously
 6     II,  12|        past event and a present process cannot be "contiguous",
 7     II,  12|        past event and a present process cannot be "contiguous",
 8     II,  12|        be "contiguous", for the process is divisible, the event
 9     II,  12|         the relation of present process to past event is analogous
10     II,  12|       of line to point, since a process contains an infinity of
11     II,  12|        certain kind of circular process of coming-to-be; and this
12     II,  12|      chapters, and the circular process is an instance of this.
13     II,  13|       obvious that when by this process one reaches subjects incapable
14     II,  13|        must then apply the same process to another set of individuals
15     II,  19|        as to be capable of this process.~Let us now restate the
16     II,  19| rudimentary universals, and the process does not cease until the
17     II,  19|       animal, which by the same process is a step towards a further