Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |          the above description as belonging essentially to their respective
 2      I,  4 |   predicate is the proof of it as belonging to this first subject commensurately
 3      I,  4 |          while the proof of it as belonging to the other subjects to
 4      I,  5 |         can it be demonstrated as belonging commensurately and universally?)"
 5      I,  5 |         it can be demonstrated as belonging commensurately and universally.~
 6      I,  9 |     inhering accidentally, not as belonging to its subject as such:
 7      I,  9 |      equal to two right angles as belonging to that subject in which
 8      I,  11|        attributes demonstrated as belonging to them-all the sciences
 9      I,  22|          of a quale, nor any term belonging to an adjectival category
10      I,  24|         this-some separate entity belonging to the real world; that,
11     II,  4 |           and predicated of it as belonging to its essence. But in that
12     II,  4 |           universally of all C as belonging to C’s essence, A also must
13     II,  4 |        must be predicated of C as belonging to its essence.~If one does
14     II,  4 | necessarily be predicated of C as belonging to its essence. So both
15     II,  11|         Why is B the cause of A’s belonging to C? Because to be in a
16     II,  13|          attributes predicated as belonging to the essential nature
17     II,  13|       this way, are predicated as belonging to its essential nature,