Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  12|         occur through taking as middles mere attributes of the major
 2      I,  19|         there be an infinity of middles? I mean this: suppose for
 3      I,  19|         B and A there are other middles, and between these again
 4      I,  19|       between these again fresh middles; can these proceed to infinity
 5      I,  21|       plain that the regress of middles terminates in the case of
 6      I,  24|         to inhere in D, and the middles were B and C, B being the
 7      I,  25|       terms are known, and that middles which are prior are better
 8      I,  25|      one proving it through the middles B, C and D, the other through
 9      I,  29|      same series of predication middles which are other than the
10      I,  29| conclusion can be drawn through middles which are different, i.e.
11      I,  29|        so that neither of these middles is predicable of the other,
12      I,  32|         false; nevertheless, if middles are taken to prove these
13     II,  5 |       without their appropriate middles, the alleged necessity by
14     II,  12|         there is an infinity of middles? No: though no two events
15     II,  17|        are identical by analogy middles also analogous.~The truth
16     II,  18|   merely one middle but several middles, i.e. several causes; is