Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |    that accepts its premisses, induction exhibiting the universal
 2      I,  1 |      either example, a kind of induction, or enthymeme, a form of
 3      I,  3 |       i.e. the method by which induction produces knowledge. But
 4      I,  13|      as having been reached by induction or sense-perception. Therefore
 5      I,  18|       since we learn either by induction or by demonstration, this
 6      I,  18|      develops from universals, induction from particulars; but since
 7      I,  18|      universals except through induction. But induction is impossible
 8      I,  18|  except through induction. But induction is impossible for those
 9      I,  18|      knowledge of them without induction, nor can we get it through
10      I,  18|      nor can we get it through induction without sense-perception.~
11     II,  3 |     the one without the other.~Induction too will sufficiently convince
12     II,  5 | demonstrates as little as does induction. For in a genuine demonstration
13     II,  5 |   there any absurdity in this: induction, perhaps, is not demonstration
14     II,  7 |       we may not proceed as by induction to establish a universal
15     II,  7 |    offer no exception, because induction proves not what the essential
16     II,  19|       the primary premisses by induction; for the method by which