Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |          require demonstration in order to be known, since to have
 2      I,  2 |         know its cause; prior, in order to be causes; antecedently
 3      I,  2 |           and better known in the order of being and what is prior
 4      I,  6 |   premisses should be proposed in order to deal with such and such
 5      I,  8 |       from a demonstration in the order of its terms. Demonstration
 6      I,  26|           in B is impossible.~The order of the terms is the same
 7      I,  26|         denying A of B is, in the order of being, prior to that
 8     II,  11|            Incidentally, here the order of coming to be is the reverse
 9     II,  11|           cause: in the efficient order the middle term must come
10     II,  11|       whereas in the teleological order the minor, C, must first
11     II,  13|       division. But, in fact, the order in which the attributes
12     II,  13| arrangement of these in the right order, (3) the omission of no
13     II,  13|           the accident. The right order will be achieved if the
14     II,  13|           that comes first in the order of division, pointing out
15     II,  14|                             14~In order to formulate the connexions