Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  21|         may be made clear by the following dialectical considerations.~
 2      I,  22| predicates generally we have the following prefatory remarks to make. (
 3      I,  24|     reductio ad impossibile.~The following considerations might lead
 4      I,  25|        compelled to lay down the following additional rule: as the
 5      I,  32|        shown first of all by the following dialectical considerations. (
 6     II,  4 |       argue it impossible on the following grounds:-(a) syllogism proves
 7     II,  6 |      what definable form is.~The following type of hypothetical proof
 8     II,  7 |         a fresh fact necessarily following from the assumption of premisses
 9     II,  8 |     exists. Let us then take the following as our first instance of
10     II,  8 |    without the reason, as in the following example: let C be the moon,
11     II,  11|         follows necessarily. The following example will also show this.
12     II,  12|    general theory of change.~The following must suffice as an account
13     II,  13|         of triad is shown by the following argument. If it is not identical
14     II,  17|   reciprocally predicable in the following way. If the species are
15     II,  17|     demanded, we shall offer the following. Let A be an attribute of