Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |       now assert is that at all events we do know by demonstration.
 2     II,  12|         this though these later events actually have their source
 3     II,  12|    source of origin in previous events—a fact which shows that
 4     II,  12|        the interval between the events, though A has already occurred,
 5     II,  12| argument applies also to future events; i.e. one cannot infer from
 6     II,  12|   inquire what it is that holds events together so that the coming-to-be
 7     II,  12|           for not even two past events can be "contiguous". For
 8     II,  12|       be "contiguous". For past events are limits and atomic; so
 9     II,  12|    contiguous" neither are past events, since both are indivisible.
10     II,  12|    contains an infinity of past events. These questions, however,
11     II,  12|         a series of consecutive events: for in the terms of such
12     II,  12|       since, as we said, no two events are "contiguous", will a
13     II,  12|      middles? No: though no two events are "contiguous", yet we
14     II,  12|      The like is true of future events too, since if it is true
15     II,  12|    might be urged, since future events are not "contiguous". But