Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  31|    frequent recurrence of this event we might, after tracking
 2     II,  12|       it is from the posterior event that we reason (and this
 3     II,  12|      reason from the posterior event), and from the event we
 4     II,  12| posterior event), and from the event we cannot reason (we cannot
 5     II,  12|   cannot argue that because an event A has occurred, therefore
 6     II,  12|     has occurred, therefore an event B has occurred subsequently
 7     II,  12|     say that B, the subsequent event, occurred; for in the interval
 8     II,  12|       one cannot infer from an event which occurred in the past
 9     II,  12|      in the past that a future event will occur. The reason of
10     II,  12|     things follows upon a past event. It is evident, we may suggest,
11     II,  12|       may suggest, that a past event and a present process cannot
12     II,  12|     For the same reason a past event and a present process cannot
13     II,  12|      process is divisible, the event indivisible. Thus the relation
14     II,  12|        present process to past event is analogous to that of
15     II,  12|       a middle and the present event as major. The like is true