Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |     reason is that these several objects are not equally obvious
 2      I,  2 |        known to man. I mean that objects nearer to sense are prior
 3      I,  2 |         and better known to man; objects without qualification prior
 4      I,  18|      particulars: they cannot be objects of scientific knowledge,
 5      I,  24|      simple and determinate. But objects so far as they are an indeterminate
 6      I,  33|      same, the two opinions have objects so far the same: on the
 7      I,  33| essential definable nature these objects differ. The identity of
 8      I,  33|      differ. The identity of the objects of knowledge and opinion
 9     II,  1 |   questions we ask; but for some objects of inquiry we have a different
10     II,  3 |       other: if they were, their objects would be related either
11     II,  7 |          and syllogism nor their objects are identical, and further
12     II,  13|   division one should keep three objects in view: (1) the admission
13     II,  19|   perceiving, or no knowledge of objects of which no impression persists;