Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |  follows that all commensurate universals inhere necessarily in their
 2      I,  12|        syllogism proceeds from universals, it must be), then assuredly
 3      I,  18|    demonstration develops from universals, induction from particulars;
 4      I,  18|    impossible to come to grasp universals except through induction.
 5      I,  18| knowledge, because neither can universals give us knowledge of them
 6      I,  24| particulars, inasmuch as it is universals which comprise the imperishable,
 7      I,  24|      From this it follows that universals are more demonstrable: but
 8      I,  31|   commensurately universal and universals imperceptible, we clearly
 9     II,  13|  nature are necessary and that universals are necessary, and since
10     II,  19|        among these rudimentary universals, and the process does not
11     II,  19| indivisible concepts, the true universals, are established: e.g. such