Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  3 |         does exist-an easy way of proving anything. That this is so
 2      I,  3 |           must be-a simple way of proving anything. Moreover, even
 3      I,  15|       B-there will be a syllogism proving A’s disconnexion from B
 4      I,  24|         demonstration, instead of proving that the subject itself
 5      I,  24|       superior as more especially proving the cause, that is the reasoned
 6      I,  25|      inherence of A in E, the one proving it through the middles B,
 7      I,  29| investigating is how many ways of proving the same conclusion can
 8     II,  3 |        right angles". An argument proving this difference between
 9     II,  8 |           method just examined of proving it through another essential
10     II,  8 |        nature would be one way of proving essential nature, because
11     II,  10|          former signifies without proving, but the latter will clearly