Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |           is is not the same as to affirm its existence.~Now since
 2      I,  6 |        because the replies to them affirm facts which necessitate
 3      I,  6 | propositions which if the answerer affirm, he must affirm the conclusion
 4      I,  6 |           answerer affirm, he must affirm the conclusion and affirm
 5      I,  6 |          affirm the conclusion and affirm it with truth if they are
 6      I,  11|           that it is impossible to affirm and deny simultaneously
 7      I,  22|        remarks to make. (1) We can affirm without falsehood "the white (
 8      I,  22|           in the two cases. When I affirm "the white is a log", I
 9      I,  22|          On the other hand, when I affirm "the log is white", I do
10      I,  22|        subject, the predicate must affirm of the subject either some
11      I,  23|        fact some basic truths will affirm and some will deny being.~