Book, Paragraph

1      I,  2 |      is to be quantitatively indivisible; but it is not a hypothesis,
2      I,  22|  former, multiplicity or the indivisible, which are elements in the
3      I,  22|   interval was immediate and indivisible, but that all intervals
4      I,  23| subject and predicate become indivisible, i.e. one. We have our unit
5     II,  6 |     contrary of evil and the indivisible of the divisible, we conclude
6     II,  6 |    good is essentially to be indivisible. The question is begged
7     II,  12|  past events, since both are indivisible. For the same reason a past
8     II,  12|      is divisible, the event indivisible. Thus the relation of present
9     II,  19|     does not cease until the indivisible concepts, the true universals,