Book, Paragraph

  1      I, 3 |         we may take this much as clear in addition to what has
  2      I, 4 |       universally related, it is clear in this figure when a syllogism
  3      I, 4 |       already been stated) it is clear that this arrangement of
  4      I, 4 |      animal, white, stone.~It is clear then from what has been
  5      I, 5 |   reductio ad impossibile.~It is clear then that a syllogism is
  6      I, 5 |       line, animal, stone.~It is clear then that if a syllogism
  7      I, 5 |         animal, inanimate. It is clear then from what has been
  8      I, 6 |     being the middle term.~It is clear then in this figure also
  9      I, 6 |          inanimate, white.~It is clear then in this figure also
 10      I, 6 |        must be so related. It is clear also that all the syllogisms
 11      I, 7 |        in all the figures.~It is clear too that all the imperfect
 12      I, 7 |         the middle figure, it is clear that particular syllogisms
 13      I, 7 |         may be so reduced. It is clear then that all syllogisms
 14      I, 8 |       for them to belong), it is clear that there will be different
 15      I, 9 |          is one of the Bs, it is clear that for C also the positive
 16      I, 9 |         an example also makes it clear that the conclusion not
 17      I, 10|          belong to some C, it is clear that B will not belong to
 18      I, 11|   Further, the point may be made clear by considering the terms.
 19      I, 11|    either. Further, the point is clear if we look at the terms.
 20      I, 12|                         12~It is clear then that a simple conclusion
 21      I, 12|        Consequently this also is clear, that the conclusion will
 22      I, 13|       the possible is correct is clear from the phrases by which
 23      I, 13|       possibly not belong, it is clear that if it is possible that
 24      I, 13|         all B admits of A. It is clear then that the expression "
 25      I, 14|         belong to all C. This is clear from the definition: for
 26      I, 14|       syllogism as before. It is clear then that if the minor premiss
 27      I, 14|     possible for some C. This is clear from the definition of being
 28      I, 14|         belong to some C, then a clear syllogism does not result
 29      I, 14|       belong to the minor. It is clear then that if the terms are
 30      I, 14|   necessarily or possibly. It is clear that there is no proof of
 31      I, 14|           is not possible.~It is clear that if the terms are universal
 32      I, 15|  possibly belongs to no C.~It is clear that perfect syllogisms
 33      I, 15|        necessarily animal. It is clear then that the universal
 34      I, 15|         to this). Further, it is clear also from an example that
 35      I, 16|          That it is imperfect is clear from the proof: for it will
 36      I, 16|    possible for all C. And it is clear that the possibility of
 37      I, 16|      negative assertoric. [It is clear also that all the syllogisms
 38      I, 17|        may belong to no A, it is clear that B may belong to all
 39      I, 17|       may belong to no B". It is clear then that in relation to
 40      I, 17| consequently no syllogism. It is clear from what has been said
 41      I, 17|      there is a syllogism, it is clear that its conclusion will
 42      I, 17|    possible for it to belong, is clear. For no horse is a man.
 43      I, 19|       But at the same time it is clear that B will not belong to
 44      I, 19|        and the same terms.~It is clear then from what has been
 45      I, 19|   conclusion can be drawn. It is clear too that a syllogism is
 46      I, 19|          or necessary. And it is clear that all the syllogisms
 47      I, 21|       the first figure. So it is clear that we shall have not a
 48      I, 22|     premiss is problematic-it is clear that the conclusion will
 49      I, 22|         terms may be used.~It is clear then in this figure also
 50      I, 23|                         23~It is clear from what has been said
 51      I, 23|       can be so treated, will be clear presently, when it has been
 52      I, 23|        of our contention will be clear with regard to those which
 53      I, 23|      which we have spoken, it is clear that every syllogism must
 54      I, 23|       middle term or many.~It is clear then that the ostensive
 55      I, 23|        this has been shown it is clear that every syllogism is
 56      I, 24|      remainders are equal.~It is clear then that in every syllogism
 57      I, 24|          be universal. And it is clear also that in every syllogism
 58      I, 24|      forms of predication.~It is clear also when a syllogism in
 59      I, 25|                         25~It is clear too that every demonstration
 60      I, 25|   original proposition.~So it is clear that every demonstration
 61      I, 25|        This being evident, it is clear that a syllogistic conclusion
 62      I, 25|    perfect the syllogisms. It is clear therefore that in whatever
 63      I, 26|        moods in the third. It is clear then that the universal
 64      I, 26|   problem, all these matters are clear from what has been said.~
 65      I, 27|         and animal of man. It is clear then that some things are
 66      I, 27|          definite, the matter is clear. Similarly one must select
 67      I, 27|    reason why this is so will be clear in the sequel.~
 68      I, 28|         into a particular.~It is clear then that in every proposition
 69      I, 28|         follow the latter.~It is clear too that the inquiry proceeds
 70      I, 28|       belong to the other.~It is clear too that other methods of
 71      I, 28|        cannot belong to E.~It is clear then that from the inquiries
 72      I, 29|         no E and to all A, it is clear that A will belong to no
 73      I, 29|        present this much must be clear, that we must look to terms
 74      I, 29|      modes of predication.~It is clear then from what has been
 75      I, 30|          proof, and to make that clear, whose nature does not admit
 76      I, 31|  conclusion, they do not make it clear, and show it to be necessary,
 77      I, 31|       which might be used. It is clear that it is neither possible
 78      I, 31|          C for "diagonal". It is clear then that this method of
 79      I, 31|         what has been said it is clear from what elements demonstrations
 80      I, 34|         no fallacy arises. It is clear then that in such premisses
 81      I, 35|          demonstrable. For it is clear that the middle must not
 82      I, 41|        we take three terms it is clear that the expression "A is
 83      I, 42|   problems in each figure, it is clear from the conclusion in what
 84      I, 44|        present this much must be clear, that it is not possible
 85      I, 45|          only. The point will be clear in the sequel. If A belongs
 86      I, 45|        will be particular.~It is clear that in order to resolve
 87      I, 45|       admit of conversion.~It is clear then that the same syllogisms
 88      I, 45|        what is impossible.~It is clear from what we have said how
 89      I, 46|          at all. Therefore it is clear that "it is not-good" is
 90      I, 46|         it is a white log. It is clear also that A and C cannot
 91      I, 46|          not white". Since it is clear that "it is not-white" and "
 92      I, 46|        and C cannot. First it is clear from the following consideration
 93      I, 46|         to the same thing; it is clear that D must follow B. Again
 94      I, 46|        impossible results. It is clear then that B does not reciprocate
 95     II, 1 |          subordinate to A is not clear by means of the syllogism.
 96     II, 2 |          true premisses, is made clear by this consideration. If
 97     II, 2 |   belongs, and B to all C. It is clear then that when the first
 98     II, 3 |         of the same terms.~It is clear also that our thesis holds
 99     II, 3 |       conclusion true.~(6) It is clear too that though both premisses
100     II, 4 |          belong to some C, it is clear that if the premiss AC is
101     II, 4 |          partly false.~(5) It is clear also in the case of particular
102     II, 4 |       negative statements.~It is clear then that if the conclusion
103     II, 5 |          must belong to A. It is clear then that only if the terms
104     II, 7 |        particular, so that it is clear that it is not possible
105     II, 7 |       syllogism be formed.~It is clear then that in the first figure
106     II, 7 |       made through itself. It is clear also that in the third figure
107     II, 8 |         takes. This will be made clear by the sequel. By contradictory
108     II, 10|         what has been said it is clear how a syllogism results
109     II, 10|      premiss, is obtained. It is clear that in the first figure
110     II, 11|                         11~It is clear then what conversion is,
111     II, 11|       already, but because it is clear that it is true. The terms
112     II, 11|        all B. Consequently it is clear that the universal affirmative
113     II, 11|           for let it be true and clear that A belongs to all C):
114     II, 11|         will be identical.~It is clear then that not the contrary
115     II, 12|                         12~It is clear then that in the first figure
116     II, 12| impossible (for suppose it to be clear that C belongs to all B):
117     II, 12|       not belong to all B. It is clear then that all the syllogisms
118     II, 13|          result as before.~It is clear then that in all the syllogisms
119     II, 14|         A and to no B. And it is clear from these premisses that
120     II, 14|       the last figure. And it is clear from these premisses that
121     II, 14|         the middle figure.~It is clear then that it is possible
122     II, 14|    problem will be solved. It is clear then that every thesis can
123     II, 15|       not possible, will be made clear in this way. Verbally four
124     II, 15|       the third figure. So it is clear in how many ways and in
125     II, 15|         which are opposed.~It is clear too that from false premisses
126     II, 16|       belong to B, it is not yet clear whether he begs the original
127     II, 17|        in reference to it. It is clear then that the expression "
128     II, 17|   syllogisms are negative.~It is clear then that when the impossibility
129     II, 20|     terms must be related, it is clear when refutation will be
130     II, 22|          but not together, it is clear that B or D belongs to everything,
131     II, 22|        to which D belongs, it is clear that A belongs to it. But
132     II, 22|        of itself and of C, it is clear that B will be said of everything
133     II, 22|         represented by B), it is clear that A (being of such a
134     II, 23|                         23~It is clear then how the terms are related
135     II, 24|        against neighbours, it is clear that to fight against the
136     II, 24|    Thebans is an evil. Now it is clear that B belongs to C and
137     II, 25|         C for justice. Now it is clear that knowledge can be taught:
138     II, 26|       follow B. This can be made clear only by other premisses.
139     II, 26|       have its new premiss quite clear immediately. For this reason
140     II, 27|         large extremities, it is clear that this is the sign of