Book, Paragraph

  1      I, 2 |        assumed that every B is A. Similarly too, if the premiss is particular.
  2      I, 4 |           by "predicated of all". Similarly also, if A is predicated
  3      I, 7 |        does not belong to some A. Similarly also in the other figures:
  4      I, 7 |      stated) it belongs to all C. Similarly also with the rest.~It is
  5      I, 7 |       means of the second figure. Similarly also demonstration will
  6      I, 9 |        necessarily, nor does man. Similarly also if the major premiss
  7      I, 9 |      belong necessarily to all B. Similarly also if the syllogism should
  8      I, 11|           conversion is possible. Similarly also if AC should be necessary
  9      I, 11|        should be asleep or awake. Similarly and by means of the same
 10      I, 13|         to belong to some B". And similarly the other propositions in
 11      I, 14|        belong to all of another". Similarly if it is possible for A
 12      I, 14|          syllogism again results. Similarly if in both the premisses
 13      I, 16|           necessary and negative. Similarly if the relation is problematic:
 14      I, 17|   conclusion can always be drawn. Similarly when one premiss is necessary,
 15      I, 17| proposition "A belongs to all B". Similarly also they are opposed to
 16      I, 18|        that B may belong to no C. Similarly also if the minor premiss
 17      I, 18|          possible (this is proved similarly and by the same examples
 18      I, 19|         we have the first figure. Similarly if the minor premiss is
 19      I, 20|      possible for some of the Bs. Similarly if the proposition BC is
 20      I, 21|           we saw) is problematic. Similarly if the proposition BC is
 21      I, 25|          number of the terms will similarly exceed that of the premisses
 22      I, 25|           other in relation to B. Similarly with any further additions.
 23      I, 25|        any further additions. And similarly too if the term is inserted
 24      I, 26|        universal negative in two. Similarly with universal negatives:
 25      I, 27|    definite, the matter is clear. Similarly one must select those attributes
 26      I, 28|          KF, it may yet follow F. Similarly we must consider the antecedents
 27      I, 29|         assumed to belong to all. Similarly with the other propositions
 28      I, 29|    impossibile to belong to no E. Similarly with the rest. In all cases
 29      I, 29|      through these terms as well. Similarly also with the other modes
 30      I, 30|        astronomy were discovered. Similarly with any other art or science.
 31      I, 32|         each figure. It is placed similarly too if the premisses are
 32      I, 38|       false and not intelligible. Similarly if it should be proved that
 33      I, 40|          the term will be "good". Similarly in all other cases.~
 34      I, 45|    belongs to no A, and to all C. Similarly if the syllogism is not
 35      I, 45|           third figure is formed. Similarly if the syllogism is negative:
 36      I, 45|         so C will be middle term. Similarly if the negative statement
 37      I, 46|        thing.~Privative terms are similarly related positive ter terms
 38      I, 46|           are not-white is false. Similarly also "every animal is not-white"
 39      I, 46|        belongs to everything, and similarly either H or D, and since
 40      I, 46|       neither good nor not-good". Similarly also with C and D. For two
 41     II, 1 |          E will be included in A. Similarly if the syllogism is negative.
 42     II, 1 |          the preceding syllogism. Similarly in the other figures. That
 43     II, 2 |           every man is an animal. Similarly with the negative. For it
 44     II, 2 |          and B belonged to all C. Similarly there cannot be a true conclusion
 45     II, 2 |          every swan is an animal. Similarly if the statement AB is negative.
 46     II, 2 |       premiss BC is wholly false. Similarly if the premiss AB is negative.
 47     II, 2 |        this ex hypothesi is true. Similarly if the premiss AB is negative.
 48     II, 2 |          and the conclusion true. Similarly if the premiss AB is negative:
 49     II, 2 |          and the conclusion true. Similarly if the premiss AB is negative.
 50     II, 2 |        the statement BC is false. Similarly if the premiss AB is negative.
 51     II, 2 |          conclusion will be true. Similarly if the premiss AB is negative:
 52     II, 2 |         both premisses are false. Similarly also if the premiss AB is
 53     II, 3 |          yield a true conclusion. Similarly if A belongs to all B and
 54     II, 3 |          and the conclusion true. Similarly if the negative statement
 55     II, 3 |           the conclusion is true. Similarly, if the negative premiss
 56     II, 3 |           the conclusion is true. Similarly if the premiss AB is affirmative:
 57     II, 3 |         but the particular false. Similarly if the premiss which is
 58     II, 3 |           the conclusion is true. Similarly if the universal premiss
 59     II, 4 |          but the conclusion true. Similarly if one premiss is negative,
 60     II, 4 |           the conclusion is true. Similarly if the premiss AC is stated
 61     II, 4 |           conclusion is true.~(3) Similarly if one of the premisses
 62     II, 4 |          and the conclusion true. Similarly if the statement BC is false,
 63     II, 4 |           the conclusion is true. Similarly if the premiss AC which
 64     II, 4 |       false, the conclusion true. Similarly if of the premisses assumed
 65     II, 5 |         premiss BC converted, and similarly the proposition BC through
 66     II, 8 |   reference to the minor extreme. Similarly if the syllogism is negative.
 67     II, 8 |         will belong not to all B. Similarly if the syllogism is negative.
 68     II, 8 |           premisses is universal. Similarly if the syllogism is negative:
 69     II, 10|            B belongs to no C. And similarly if one of the premisses
 70     II, 10|            B will belong to no C.~Similarly if the original syllogism
 71     II, 11|       contradictory then is true. Similarly in the other figures: for
 72     II, 11|         does not belong to all B. Similarly if the other premiss taken
 73     II, 11|          the hypothesis is false. Similarly if the other premiss assumed
 74     II, 11|         that it belongs to all B. Similarly if we should be proving
 75     II, 13|                                13~Similarly they can all be formed in
 76     II, 14|           that A belongs to no B. Similarly if has been proved not to
 77     II, 14|           all A but not to all B. Similarly too, if the premiss CA should
 78     II, 14|          A must belong to some B. Similarly if B or A should be assumed
 79     II, 14|         we have the first figure. Similarly if it has been proved that
 80     II, 14|  premisses form the first figure. Similarly if the demonstration establishes
 81     II, 14|        this is the middle figure. Similarly if the demonstration is
 82     II, 14|     problems ostensively as well. Similarly it will be possible if the
 83     II, 15|        science then is a science. Similarly if after taking "every science
 84     II, 15|   concerned B, now it concerns C. Similarly if one premiss is not universal:
 85     II, 15|    science will not be a science. Similarly if the premiss BA is not
 86     II, 15|        the terms may be reversed. Similarly in the third figure. So
 87     II, 16|          with three propositions.~Similarly if he should assume that
 88     II, 17|     disappear if B is eliminated. Similarly when the syllogisms are
 89     II, 17|     conclusion would still stand. Similarly if one takes the terms in
 90     II, 20|           refutation is possible. Similarly refutation is not possible
 91     II, 21|         the figure is a triangle. Similarly in all other cases.~By a
 92     II, 21|      apprehending the particular. Similarly in the cases stated above.
 93     II, 21|       will think that C is B, and similarly that B is A, consequently
 94     II, 21|          is true, A is true of C, similarly with the word "think". Similarly
 95     II, 21|  similarly with the word "think". Similarly also with the word "is";
 96     II, 21|         as A, C is the same as A. Similarly therefore with "opine".
 97     II, 22|       with B through A as middle. Similarly if the conclusion is negative,
 98     II, 22|        and B are convertible, and similarly C and D, and if A or C must
 99     II, 22|           is preferable to B, and similarly D is preferable to C, then
100     II, 22|           are opposites: and C is similarly related to D, since they
101     II, 24|         will be proved through D. Similarly if the belief in the relation
102     II, 26|     subjects of a single science.~Similarly if the premiss objected