Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |  distinctions we now state by what means, when, and how every syllogism
 2      I, 4 |           cannot be a syllogism by means of these premisses. As an
 3      I, 4 |        Then if "predicated of all" means what was said above, it
 4      I, 4 |          they are all completed by means of the premisses originally
 5      I, 5 |           the result is reached by means of the first figure. Again
 6      I, 5 |      conclusion is not attained by means of this figure, but all
 7      I, 6 |            universal conclusion by means of this figure, whether
 8      I, 7 |        syllogism always results by means of conversion. It is evident
 9      I, 7 |     syllogisms are made perfect by means of the first figure. For
10      I, 7 |         brought to a conclusion by means of conversion, and conversion
11      I, 7 |           syllogism comes about by means of the first figure, e.g.
12      I, 7 |     possible also to prove them by means of the second figure, reducing
13      I, 7 |           to no C: this we know by means of the second figure. Similarly
14      I, 7 |           directly made perfect by means of those syllogisms; but,
15      I, 7 |        premisses is particular, by means of the particular syllogisms
16      I, 8 |          proved to be necessary by means of conversion, in the same
17      I, 10|       point can be demonstrated by means of the same terms.~
18      I, 11|            awake. Similarly and by means of the same terms proof
19      I, 13|           when and how and by what means it can be proved. I use
20      I, 13|        used in two ways. In one it means to happen generally and
21      I, 13|       another sense the expression means the indefinite, which can
22      I, 13|      possible of the subject of B" means that it is possible either
23      I, 14|        that of which B may be true means (as we saw) that none of
24      I, 15|      syllogism will be possible by means of conversion when the major
25      I, 16|     imperfect and are perfected by means of the figures above mentioned.]~
26      I, 17|           to no B and to all C. By means of conversion no syllogism
27      I, 17|       demonstration can be made by means of the same terms. And whenever
28      I, 18|          the same as above, and by means of the same terms. But when
29      I, 18|      syllogism is made, proving by means of the first figure that
30      I, 18|         conclusion can be drawn by means of conversion, as before.
31      I, 19|    imperfect, and are completed by means of the figures mentioned.~
32      I, 20|           have the first figure by means of conversion. But if one
33      I, 21|           for all are completed by means of the first figure. So
34      I, 21|         premisses, and proceeds by means of the same terms.~
35      I, 22|            must be made perfect by means of the first figure, so
36      I, 22|         syllogism can be formed by means of conversion; but if it
37      I, 22|           they are made perfect by means of the first figure.~
38      I, 23|        figures are made perfect by means of universal syllogisms
39      I, 23|         syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures;
40      I, 23|            something impossible by means of an hypothesis conceded
41      I, 23|         syllogisms are effected by means of these figures, it is
42      I, 23|      original thesis is reached by means of a concession or some
43      I, 23|        syllogism must be formed by means of the three figures mentioned
44      I, 23|          syllogism is perfected by means of the first figure and
45      I, 25|     syllogistic inference, e.g. by means of D and E, and again B
46      I, 25|            D and E, and again B by means of F and G. Or one may be
47      I, 25|     reached as C is established by means of A and B. Suppose that
48      I, 25|          happens to be inferred by means of several terms only in
49      I, 25|           conclusion is reached by means of prosyllogisms or by means
50      I, 25|       means of prosyllogisms or by means of several continuous middle
51      I, 25|         e.g. the proposition AB by means of the middle terms C and
52      I, 26|           affirmative is proved by means of the first figure only
53      I, 26|            to refute statements by means of one another, I mean,
54      I, 26|            universal statements by means of particular, and particular
55      I, 26|           particular statements by means of universal: but it is
56      I, 26|            universal statements by means of particular, though it
57      I, 26|           particular statements by means of universal. At the same
58      I, 28|          not possible to refute by means of a consequent of both
59      I, 28|           syllogism is produced by means of these. For if the consequents
60      I, 29|            they also are formed by means of the consequents and antecedents
61      I, 29| syllogistically per impossibile by means of the same terms; and what
62      I, 29|     syllogism will be ostensive by means of the same terms. For the
63      I, 29|      syllogism cannot be formed by means of other terms.~
64      I, 30|     possible, and consider them by means of the three terms, refuting
65      I, 41|            all of which B is said" means this, "A is said of all
66      I, 46|            he is not able to walk" means the same as "he is able
67      I, 46|        call it not-white; for this means that it is not-white. But
68      I, 46|           proved constructively by means of the first figure. For
69     II, 1 |           of inquiry, also by what means we shall obtain principles
70     II, 1 |   subordinate to A is not clear by means of the syllogism. And yet
71     II, 2 |            the conclusion, and the means by which this comes about
72     II, 3 |           the proof can be made by means of the same terms. Also
73     II, 3 |           the proof can be made by means of the same terms.~It is
74     II, 5 |      Circular and reciprocal proof means proof by means of the conclusion,
75     II, 5 |    reciprocal proof means proof by means of the conclusion, i.e.
76     II, 8 |           8~To convert a syllogism means to alter the conclusion
77     II, 14|        those which are obtained by means of conversion, so that we
78     II, 15|           syllogism can be made by means of premisses which are opposed.~
79     II, 16|        establish the antecedent by means of its consequents; for
80     II, 16|    themselves, and other things by means of something else (the first
81     II, 16|        what is not self-evident by means of itself, then he begs
82     II, 16|       reason thus are proving A by means of itself. This is what
83     II, 16|       which is not self-evident by means of itself.~If then begging
84     II, 16|        what is not self-evident by means of itself, in other words
85     II, 18|            A and B are inferred by means of D, E, F, and G. Therefore
86     II, 21|            perceived it, except by means of the universal and the
87     II, 23|           syllogisms are formed by means of the aforesaid figures,
88     II, 23|          extreme and the middle by means of the other extreme, e.g.
89     II, 23|        belong to the third term by means of the middle, the former
90     II, 23|            belong to the middle by means of the third. In the order
91     II, 24|            belong to the middle by means of a term which resembles
92     II, 27|            show affection". A sign means a demonstrative proposition