Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 | concerning something else in the way we have described; it will
 2      I, 1 |        be understood in the same way.~
 3      I, 3 |       natural (and it is in this way we define the possible),
 4      I, 4 |         are related in any other way, a syllogism is impossible.
 5      I, 4 |   negative.~Nor can there in any way be a syllogism if both the
 6      I, 5 |       relation), but in no other way. Let M be predicated of
 7      I, 5 |       belongs to some O. In this way then it is not admissible
 8      I, 5 |    related to one another in the way stated, a syllogism results
 9      I, 6 |         demonstrated in the same way as before by converting
10      I, 6 |         demonstrated in the same way as the preceding. And it
11      I, 7 |       though not all in the same way; the universal syllogisms
12      I, 8 |        terms are put in the same way, then, whether something
13      I, 9 |      premisses are taken in this way, A will necessarily belong
14      I, 13|    inclines by nature in the one way more than in the opposite.~
15      I, 13|          not however in the same way: but what is natural is
16      I, 13|         because it inclines this way no more than that. Science
17      I, 14|   definition: for it was in this way that we explained "to be
18      I, 14|  indefinite or particular, in no way will a syllogism be possible.
19      I, 15|         necessary results in any way; but if the problematic
20      I, 17| indefinite, or in whatever other way the premisses can be altered,
21      I, 19|       terms are arranged in this way, no syllogism is possible.
22      I, 19|        can be proved in the same way as for universal propositions,
23      I, 20|       the conclusion in the same way as before.~First let the
24      I, 23|       somehow related to each by way of predication. For the
25      I, 23|         are effected in the same way. For all who effect an argument
26      I, 25|         than three terms in this way, but it cannot be reached
27      I, 25|          must be related in this way. Suppose then that A stands
28      I, 26| statements can be refuted in one way only-by proving that the
29      I, 28|         clearer in the following way. Suppose the consequents
30      I, 28|    syllogism is possible in this way.~It is evident too that
31      I, 28|         same thing differs in no way from the fact that B is
32      I, 28|      gratuitously for some other way than the necessary way because
33      I, 28|     other way than the necessary way because they have failed
34      I, 29|       syllogistically in another way, e.g. universal problems
35      I, 29|      consider the matter in this way also. The method is the
36      I, 29| syllogisms can be formed in this way, but also that they cannot
37      I, 30|       refuting statements in one way, confirming them in another,
38      I, 31|           he assumes in the same way that A inheres either in
39      I, 31|     Always dividing then in this way it turns out that these
40      I, 32|     arguments put forward in the way described. In some arguments
41      I, 32|        is determined in the same way. Clearly then, if the same
42      I, 34|   fallacy may occur in a similar way in the middle figure: "it
43      I, 36|        of the middle in the same way as the middle is predicated
44      I, 36|         asserted in a particular way, in relation to the terms
45      I, 36|    animal", or in whatever other way the word falls in the premiss.~
46      I, 38|   identical with a good. In this way an analysis of the argument
47      I, 38|       must take the terms in the way stated.~
48      I, 40|        out the terms in the same way; but if the syllogism is
49      I, 45|      must take them in a similar way. Let B belong to all C,
50      I, 46|         may be true in a similar way, viz. that all are not white
51      I, 46|         or not-white in the same way for both are proved constructively
52      I, 46|          are related in the same way, and A follows C but the
53      I, 46|          are related in the same way, and follows everything
54     II, 2 |       terms arranged in the same way will serve for the proof.~(
55     II, 3 |          it is possible in every way to reach a true conclusion
56     II, 4 |        versa, and in every other way in which it is possible
57     II, 4 |         false, in every possible way. For the same terms must
58     II, 5 |        belongs to B. In no other way is reciprocal proof possible.
59     II, 6 |  affirmative proposition in this way, but a negative proposition
60     II, 7 |      some of the Bs. In no other way is it possible by converting
61     II, 7 |       the other: for in no other way can a syllogism be formed.~
62     II, 10|         and to no C. Thus in one way the premisses are refuted,
63     II, 10|        are refuted, in the other way they are not.~From what
64     II, 11|       both are taken in the same way. For example if A belongs
65     II, 11|          may proceed in the same way if the proposition CA has
66     II, 11|         accepted. But in neither way does it suit to maintain
67     II, 13|      conclusion, are proved in a way.~
68     II, 14|        or to some C: for in this way we shall get what is impossible.
69     II, 14|         we may infer in the same way. The hypothesis is that
70     II, 15|       will be made clear in this way. Verbally four kinds of
71     II, 15|         to take opposites in the way we said, viz. "all science
72     II, 15|           or to assume it in the way suggested in the Topics.
73     II, 15|       single syllogism in such a way that we conclude that what
74     II, 15|          syllogisms. In no other way than this, as was said before,
75     II, 16|      thing is, if it is: in this way everything will be self-evident.
76     II, 16|      indifferently (in a similar way the question may be begged
77     II, 17|          F belongs to A. In this way too the impossible conclusion
78     II, 17|          original terms: in this way it will depend on the hypothesis,
79     II, 19|         begin with that: in this way he will most likely deceive
80     II, 20|          are defined in the same way.~
81     II, 21|      belong to all D in the same way. If then a man thinks that
82     II, 21|         think? For he knows in a way that A belongs to C through
83     II, 21|          that what he knows in a way, this he maintains he does
84     II, 21|      partially contrary. In this way then it is not possible
85     II, 21|          criticized in a similar way. For it never happens that
86     II, 23|      through induction. And in a way induction is opposed to
87     II, 27|          good but wise." In this way then syllogisms are formed,
88     II, 27|        terms are related in this way: for though a woman with
89     II, 27|       either divide signs in the way stated, and among them designate